Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

it was added to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was added to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing the action of including something as part of a larger whole or list. Example: "The new feature was added to the software update to enhance user experience."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Based on its carcinogenicity, it was added to California's Proposition 65 List of Potential Carcinogens in 2011.

When South Korea finalized its deal with Canada last spring, it was added to the AFCCL within months.

News & Media

Vice

This series was a collection on its own up until August 2007, when it was added to this collection.

Its stock is down 97% since it was added to the Dow.

News & Media

Forbes

Its construction dates to the 16th century, and in 2000 it was added to UNESCO's list of World Heritage sites.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

It was added to UNESCO's World Heritage List in 1984.

But this year it was added to the Oxford Dictionary.

News & Media

Independent

It was added to the Olympics in 1988.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was added to the show in the final preview.

News & Media

The New York Times

The revisers say it was added to 'make more definite the provisions as to jurisdiction.' Id.

It was added to the UNESCO World Heritage List in 1979.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was added to", ensure that the subject and object are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify what "it" refers to and what it was added to.

Common error

Avoid using "it was added to" when the reference for "it" is unclear or ambiguous. Always ensure the pronoun has a clear antecedent in the sentence or preceding context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was added to" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has undergone the action of being included or attached to something else. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Academia

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was added to" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to indicate that something has been included or attached to something else. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely used across diverse contexts, ranging from news and media to scientific publications. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in pronoun reference to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "it was included in" or "it was incorporated into" for subtle variations in meaning. Pay attention to the nuances of each alternative to ensure you are conveying your intended message accurately.

FAQs

How can I use "it was added to" in a sentence?

Use "it was added to" to indicate that something has been included or incorporated into something else. For example, "The new feature "it was added to" the software update".

What are some alternatives to "it was added to"?

You can use alternatives like "it was included in", "it was incorporated into", or "it was appended to" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "it was added to" or "it was included in"?

The choice between ""it was added to"" and "it was included in" depends on the specific meaning you want to convey. "Added to" suggests appending or supplementing, while "included in" simply means it's part of something.

What's the difference between "it was added to" and "it was attached to"?

"It was added to" implies incorporation or inclusion, whereas "it was attached to" suggests a physical connection or association. The best choice depends on the specific context.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: