it was added

USAGE SUMMARY

"it was added" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you want to indicate that something has been added. For example: "The author added an extra chapter to the book, so it was added to the final edition."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

This series was a collection on its own up until August 2007, when it was added to this collection.

Columbia University

Its stock is down 97% since it was added to the Dow.

Forbes

"It was added," McCarthy told Yahoo Movies.

The Guardian - Film

"He doesn't look like himself," whoever it was added.

The New Yorker

But this year it was added to the Oxford Dictionary.

Independent

It was added to UNESCO's World Heritage List in 1984.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was added to the Olympics in 1988.

The New York Times

It was added to the show in the final preview.

The New York Times

It was added for sale on Amazon Canada on Monday.

The Guardian - Books

"You can clearly see it was added later".

The New York Times

The revisers say it was added to 'make more definite the provisions as to jurisdiction.' Id.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was added" to clearly indicate when something has been incorporated or included, providing context as to how and why the addition occurred.

Common error

Ensure the context makes clear what "it" refers to when using "it was added". Avoid ambiguity by rephrasing if the subject is unclear.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was added" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something was incorporated or included into something else. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

23%

Wiki

18%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was added" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to indicate that something has been included or incorporated. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is versatile, appearing across diverse contexts from news and media to scientific publications. The phrase serves primarily to inform about an inclusion, often highlighting the timing or reason behind it. While generally neutral in tone, clarity regarding what "it" refers to is crucial to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as ""it was included"" and ""it was incorporated"" offer subtle variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was included

Focuses on the inclusion of something within a larger set or context.

it was appended

Suggests something was attached or added to the end of something else.

it was incorporated

Emphasizes the integration of something into a cohesive whole.

it was inserted

Indicates that something was placed within something else, often in a precise location.

it was attached

Implies that something was joined or fastened to something else.

it was supplemented

Suggests that something was added to enhance or complete something else.

it was joined

Focuses on the act of something being connected or united with something else.

it was affixed

Indicates that something was fastened or attached securely.

it was tagged

Implies that something was marked or labeled in addition to something else.

it was injected

Suggests that something was introduced or inserted forcefully.

FAQs

How can I use "it was added" in a sentence?

You can use "it was added" to indicate that something has been included or incorporated into something else. For example, "The feature "it was added" to the software after user feedback".

What are some alternatives to saying "it was added"?

Alternatives include "it was included", "it was incorporated", or "it was appended" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "it was add" instead of "it was added"?

No, "it was add" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is ""it was added"", using the past participle of the verb "add".

What is the difference between "it was added" and "it was included"?

While similar, ""it was added"" generally means something was joined or appended, whereas ""it was included"" suggests something was already part of a larger set but now explicitly mentioned or considered.