Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it took longer
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it took longer" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about the duration of something. For example, "I thought the long car ride would take two hours, but it took longer than that."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
"Sometimes it took longer than others".
News & Media
"It's an oil and it took longer".
News & Media
It took longer, but wasn't as tiring.
News & Media
It took longer to shake his disbelief.
News & Media
It took longer to get there this time.
News & Media
It took longer for them to find David.
News & Media
It took longer for service companies to begin hiring.
News & Media
It took longer, but the prediction was correct.
News & Media
It took longer than expected, but we got there.
News & Media
It took longer to be freed from the inkwell.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
"It takes longer," he said.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "it took longer" to emphasize a delay or unexpected duration. To enhance clarity, specify what "it" refers to and quantify the extended time when possible, for example, "The renovation took longer than expected, adding two weeks to the schedule."
Common error
Avoid using "it took longer" without clearly specifying what "it" refers to. Ambiguity can confuse the reader. Ensure the context makes the subject clear, or explicitly state what required more time. For example, instead of saying "It took longer", specify "The data analysis took longer than anticipated."
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it took longer" functions as a statement of duration, indicating that something required more time than anticipated or previously experienced. Ludwig's examples show it in contexts ranging from completing tasks to physical processes.
Frequent in
News & Media
60%
Science
20%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "it took longer" is a versatile and frequently used expression to indicate that something required more time than expected. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across various contexts, including News & Media and scientific publications. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what "it" refers to and considering whether additional details about the reason for the delay would enhance understanding. Alternatives such as "it required more time" or "the process was prolonged" can offer nuanced ways to express the same idea.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it consumed more time than anticipated
Adds the element of surprise or unexpectedness regarding the time consumed.
it required more time
Replaces "took" with "required" and "longer" with "more time", emphasizing the necessity of additional time.
it demanded additional time
Emphasizes the necessity of more time, using a stronger verb like "demanded".
it extended for a greater duration
Substitutes "took" with "extended" and "longer" with "a greater duration", adding a more formal tone.
it proved more time-consuming
Changes the structure to focus on the activity as being time-consuming, rather than the time itself.
it spanned a greater period
Uses "spanned" to indicate the duration and "greater period" in place of "longer", offering a slightly more formal tone.
the process was prolonged
Shifts the focus to the process itself being prolonged, rather than stating that it took longer.
it stretched out in length
Replaces the entire phrase with a more descriptive and slightly less common expression, focusing on the prolonged nature of the event.
the completion was delayed
Focuses on the delayed completion, implying that the process took longer than expected.
achieving it was a lengthy process
Changes the structure to emphasize the length of the process required to achieve something.
FAQs
How can I use "it took longer" in a sentence?
You can use "it took longer" to indicate that something required more time than initially expected. For example, "Although we planned for a quick meeting, "it took longer" to resolve all the issues".
What can I say instead of "it took longer"?
Alternatives include "it required more time", "it proved more time-consuming", or "the process was prolonged". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
Is it grammatically correct to say "it takes longer" instead of "it took longer"?
Yes, both are grammatically correct, but they have different meanings. "It takes longer" refers to a general or habitual situation, while "it took longer" refers to a specific past event. For example, "It takes longer to drive during rush hour" versus ""it took longer" to reach the destination due to an accident".
What's the difference between "it took longer" and "it took a long time"?
"It took a long time" simply states that something required a significant amount of time. "It took longer" implies a comparison, suggesting that the activity required more time than expected or more time than a previous instance of the same activity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested