it received no

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it received no" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that something did not receive any amount or type of something, such as feedback, support, or response. Example: "Despite the efforts made, it received no acknowledgment from the committee."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Despite a massive advertising campaign conducted in its behalf, it received no nominations.

Los Angeles Times

During its (ongoing) recovery it received no help from the state, relying instead on support from its banks.

The Economist

The company said it received no commissions for its services, simply receiving a flat fee every time a customer buys a policy, and that these fees are "completely independent" of policy price.

BBC

While advisers for the two companies have talked since then, Simon made the matter public after it received no formal response to its offer.

The New York Times

It received no compensation from the United States and its transactions in essence were with citizens of the state of Pennsylvania as such.

Cornell University

Sara Lee had told both bidders that it would be willing to pursue a breakup if it received no satisfactory bids by the time its board met on Wednesday and Thursday.

The New York Times

On the other hand, if TR = 0, y uses its previous trust value Tx, y (t − t1), since it received no true recommendations.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

feared it received no national publicity whatever.

The New Yorker

But it received no additional resources.

The New York Times

His family says it received no notice of the conviction.

The New York Times

The package looks uncontroversial and it received no significant coverage.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it received no", ensure that the subject "it" is clearly defined in the context. This avoids ambiguity and makes the sentence more understandable.

Common error

Avoid using "it received no" when the antecedent of "it" is unclear. Always ensure the subject is explicitly stated or easily understood from the surrounding sentences to prevent confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it received no" typically functions as a verb phrase within a sentence. It indicates the absence of something being received. Ludwig examples show its use in various contexts, confirming its role in expressing a lack of reception. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

18%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it received no" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to indicate a lack of reception or response. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and versatile. Its frequency is very common, particularly in News & Media, Academia and Science. When using this phrase, ensure that the subject "it" is clear and that the context supports the intended meaning. Consider alternatives like "it did not get any" or "it obtained nothing" depending on the desired level of formality. Pay attention to source selection and tone to best leverage this construction in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it did not get any

Replaces "received" with "get" and uses "any" for emphasis, making it slightly more informal.

it obtained nothing

Substitutes "received" with the more formal "obtained" and "no" with "nothing", implying a complete absence of reception.

it had no response

Focuses on the lack of a response rather than the act of receiving, shifting the emphasis slightly.

it encountered no

Replaces "received" with "encountered", suggesting a lack of obstacles or opposition.

it experienced no

Uses "experienced" instead of "received", emphasizing the absence of a particular experience or outcome.

it did not meet with any

More elaborate phrasing, emphasizing the absence of a meeting or positive interaction.

it was given nothing

Shifts the focus to the act of giving, highlighting that nothing was provided.

it wasn't afforded any

Implies that something was not granted or allowed, adding a sense of denial.

it lacked any

Directly states the absence of something, simplifying the original phrase.

it failed to gain any

Highlights the failure to acquire something, emphasizing the effort involved.

FAQs

How can I use "it received no" in a sentence?

Use "it received no" to indicate a lack of something, such as support, recognition, or funding. For example, "The proposal was well-researched, but "it received no" support from the committee."

What can I say instead of "it received no"?

You can use alternatives like "it did not get any", "it obtained nothing", or "it had no response" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "it received no"?

Yes, "it received no" is grammatically correct and commonly used. It indicates that something did not receive any amount or type of something.

What's the difference between "it received no" and "it didn't receive any"?

While both phrases convey the same meaning, ""it received no"" is slightly more formal. "It didn't receive any" is more common in informal contexts.