it marked

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it marked" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something has signified or represented a particular event, change, or moment in time. Example: "The signing of the treaty marked a new era of peace between the two nations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It marked Losts return to its original timeslot on Wednesdays.

Wikipedia

"It marked me forever.

The New York Times

It marked the sixth straight monthly increase.

The New York Times

Then it marked me out as different".

The Guardian - Lifestyle

It marked a departure for Miller.

The New Yorker

It marked a change of rhetoric.

The Economist

It marked the end of Gaddafi's isolation.

The Guardian

It marked the end of an era.

The Guardian

It marked the end of classicism.

The Guardian - Arts

It marked one "Returned for Better Address".

The New York Times

But it marked the beginning of their career's decline.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it marked" to clearly indicate a specific point in time, a change, or a significant result. Ensure the subject the phrase refers to is unambiguous.

Common error

Avoid using "it marked" with overly abstract or vague subjects. For example, instead of "The feeling marked a change", specify what concrete action or event did the marking: "The decision marked a change".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it marked" functions as a verb phrase, typically used to indicate that a particular event, action, or moment served as a significant indicator or turning point. Ludwig AI confirms its usage in diverse contexts, signifying importance or a change in status.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it marked" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate the significance of an event or a turning point. According to Ludwig AI, its grammatical status is correct, and it enjoys frequent usage across diverse contexts, especially in news and media. While the phrase is suitable for various registers, writers should be mindful of the context and use alternatives where appropriate to ensure clarity and impact. Ludwig confirms that this phrase is a valuable tool for conveying importance and change in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it signified

Replaces "marked" with "signified", maintaining the sense of indication or representation.

it indicated

Substitutes "marked" with "indicated", focusing on the act of pointing something out.

it represented

Replaces "marked" with "represented", emphasizing the symbolic nature of the event.

it denoted

Substitutes "marked" with "denoted", highlighting the definition or meaning of an event.

it signaled

Replaces "marked" with "signaled", stressing the communicative aspect of the event.

it heralded

Substitutes "marked" with "heralded", suggesting the event was a precursor to something.

it inaugurated

Replaces "marked" with "inaugurated", implying the beginning of a new phase or era.

it characterized

Substitutes "marked" with "characterized", pointing to a defining feature or quality.

it distinguished

Replaces "marked" with "distinguished", highlighting the uniqueness of the event.

it set apart

Substitutes "marked" with "set apart", implying that the event made something distinct.

FAQs

How can I use "it marked" in a sentence?

Use "it marked" to show that something signified an important moment or change. For example, "The treaty "it marked" a turning point in their relationship."

What are some alternatives to "it marked"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "it signified", "it indicated", or "it represented" instead of "it marked".

Is it correct to say "it marked to be"?

No, "it marked to be" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is ""it marked"" followed by the event or outcome that was signified.

What's the difference between "it marked" and "it was marked"?

"It marked" is active voice, meaning the subject performed the action of marking. "It was marked" is passive voice, implying something else performed the action on it.