it left no

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it left no" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that something did not leave behind any trace, evidence, or result. Example: "After the storm passed, it left no sign of its fury, and the town was eerily calm."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

But it left no doubt about its quality with an 80-68 victoverover St Kilda, the team that topped the regular season standings.

The New York Times - Sports

The EFSA says it left "no stone unturned" during its full risk assessment.

BBC

It left no clicheŽ unuttered, it left no hackneyed plot device unutilised, it left no stereotype unshot.

The Guardian - Film

It left no clichŽe unuttered, it left no hackneyed plot device unutilised, it left no stereotype unshot.

The Guardian - Film

It left no smell on the breath.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

It left no mark at all.

The New York Times - Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

At three hours long, it leaves no stone unturned in its quest for the ultimate cringe.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Its cheaper than four cans of beer and it leaves no smell".

The Guardian

"It leaves no gray area.

The New York Times - Sports

Like cash, it leaves no audit trail.

The Economist

It leaves no one unshaken".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it left no" to clearly state the absence of evidence, impact, or result following an event or action. For example, "The investigation was thorough; it left no stone unturned."

Common error

Avoid using "it left no" when a partial impact or trace is present. The phrase implies a complete absence, so ensure this is accurate to maintain clarity and precision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it left no" functions as a declarative statement indicating the absence of something, such as evidence, a trace, or a result. It's often used to emphasize the completeness of this absence. Ludwig provides numerous examples demonstrating this function.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

14%

Science

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it left no" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to assert the complete absence of something. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's prevalent across various writing styles, from news reports to academic papers. While alternatives exist, such as "it resulted in nothing" or "it produced no", the key is to use it accurately, ensuring that the absence is indeed complete to maintain clarity. The phrase's neutral register makes it appropriate for diverse contexts, solidifying its place as a useful tool in effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it resulted in nothing

Replaces "left" with "resulted in", emphasizing the lack of outcome.

it produced no

Substitutes "left" with "produced", highlighting the absence of a generated result.

it showed no

Focuses on the absence of visible signs or indications.

it gave no

Emphasizes the lack of provision or impartation of something.

it provided no

Similar to 'gave no', but emphasizes the absence of something being supplied or offered.

it offered no

Stresses the absence of an offer or opportunity.

it yielded no

Highlights the lack of any return or output.

it had no

Simple substitution focusing on the lack of possession or existence.

there was no

Changes the sentence structure to emphasize the non-existence of something.

it failed to

Focuses on the failure to produce a result or leave an impact.

FAQs

How can I use "it left no" in a sentence?

Use "it left no" to indicate a complete absence of something after an event or action. For example, "The surgery was successful; "it left no" visible scar."

What are some alternatives to "it left no"?

Alternatives include "it resulted in nothing", "it produced no", or "it showed no", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "it left no trace" or "it left no traces"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "it left no trace" is often preferred when referring to an absence of any single indication, while "it left no traces" implies the absence of multiple indications.

What is the difference between "it left no doubt" and "it left no doubtings"?

"It left no doubt" is the standard and correct expression, meaning something was made clear. "It left no doubtings" is less common and can sound archaic or overly formal, though it is sometimes used for emphasis.