it is not actionable for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it is not actionable for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in legal or formal contexts to indicate that a certain action or statement does not provide grounds for legal action or is not subject to enforcement. Example: "The complaint was dismissed because it is not actionable for lack of evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It is not actionable for us".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

But however illuminating (or depending on your politics, alarming) you find this fact, it's clear that it is not actionable data.

Huffington Post

"If a dealer is late in paying his artists, it isn't actionable to say that money owed to artists tends to stick to his pocket".

Huffington Post

"In a narrow legal sense, it's not actionable under perjury laws," he added.

The New York Times

It was not full answers to questions, it was not specific information, it was not actionable.

Vice

I could understand calling him in and taking him to the woodshed for a day, but — from what I saw — it wasn't actionable.

The New York Times - Magazine

Startup, mostly private, ventures are too small for large institutional investors, and information about their performance is not actionable by traders.

Huffington Post

"Thus, the Dish proposal is not actionable".

The New York Times

They claimed the natural and ordinary meaning of the contested statements is not actionable.

BBC

PDF reports on an online report-archive are available knowledge, but they are not actionable data.

The Guardian

"If Mr. Clemens accused Mr. McNamee of being unstable, that's not actionable?" Johnson said.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it is not actionable for", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific action is being deemed inappropriate or impossible. Be precise in identifying the limitation.

Common error

Avoid assuming "actionable" solely implies 'legal action'. The term encompasses any action, whether legal, practical, or strategic. Thus, saying "it is not actionable for" might mean no action is advisable or effective, not just that no lawsuit is possible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it is not actionable for" functions as a qualifier, indicating that a particular situation or piece of information does not provide a sufficient basis or justification for taking action. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it is not actionable for" serves as a qualifier, denoting that a situation lacks grounds for action. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct. While versatile across contexts, it's most frequently seen in news media. The key is to ensure clarity on why action is unsuitable. Avoid limiting "actionable" to legal implications; it covers a broad spectrum of possible interventions. Instead, consider it as a tool for setting realistic expectations and streamlining efforts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it cannot be acted upon in regard to

Replaces "actionable" with a more descriptive phrase indicating the inability to take action, focusing on the subject affected.

it does not warrant action concerning

Emphasizes that the situation doesn't justify any intervention or response, switching from 'actionable' to 'warrant action'.

it is not a basis for legal proceedings against

Specifically refers to legal action, highlighting that the situation doesn't provide a legal foundation.

it isn't enforceable on

Focuses on the lack of enforceability, suggesting that even if action were desired, it couldn't be legally compelled.

it is not a valid claim against

Highlights the invalidity of a potential claim, indicating it lacks the necessary merit or foundation.

it's not a viable course of action regarding

Replaces "actionable" with "viable course of action", emphasizing that taking action is not a feasible option.

no action can be taken with respect to

Shifts to a passive construction, emphasizing the impossibility of taking any action.

there's no recourse available concerning

Indicates that there's no way to seek remedy or resolution, highlighting a lack of options.

it's not subject to any action relating to

Suggests that the topic is outside the scope of actions that could be taken.

it's not a matter for intervention regarding

Highlights the lack of necessity or justification for intervention, indicating the issue is best left unaddressed.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "it is not actionable for" to sound more formal?

In formal contexts, you can replace "it is not actionable for" with phrases such as "it does not warrant action concerning", "it is not a basis for legal proceedings against", or "it isn't enforceable on" to convey a similar meaning with heightened formality.

What's the difference between saying something is "not actionable" and saying it's "irrelevant"?

"Not actionable" implies that even if something is relevant, no action can or should be taken as a result. "Irrelevant" suggests the information has no bearing on the situation at all. Thus, something can be relevant but "it is not actionable for" various reasons.

Is it correct to use "actionable" outside of legal contexts?

Yes, "actionable" extends beyond legal contexts. It can describe whether any action is appropriate or feasible in response to a given situation. The examples show its use in business, intelligence, and general discussions about data or information.

What are some common situations where something might be described as "not actionable"?

Something might be described as "not actionable" when the information is too vague to act upon, when legal thresholds aren't met, when a proposed solution is impractical, or when intervening would cause more harm than good.