it has no grounds

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it has no grounds" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that a claim, argument, or belief lacks a solid basis or justification. Example: "The accusation against him is unfounded; it has no grounds in reality."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

The Conservative Party's finances are looking better, but it has no grounds for complacency, either.

The Economist

The international criminal court has ordered the release of accused Congo militia leader Thomas Lubanga, saying it has no grounds for keeping him after his trial in The Hague was put on hold.

The Guardian

Paparazzi who besieged Reese Witherspoon, the star of "Legally Blonde," on her way from a gym to her home in April undoubtedly terrified her, concluded the Target Crimes Unit of the Los Angeles district attorney's office, but it has no grounds for prosecution, The Associated Press reported.

The New York Times

The argument is abused in your country for political reasons but it has no grounds".

BBC

The college says that it has no grounds to protect the anonymity of Dolours Price, given that she effectively 'outed' herself in the newspaper interview.

BBC

Washington said it expected the Russian government to "look at all options available" to transfer him to the US to face spying charges - but Russia reportedly said it has "no grounds" to do so.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

An initial ruling went in ORG's favour saying that while Golden Eye could see the details of about 2,800 people suspected of illegally downloading its own movies, it had no grounds to pursue individuals who had accessed other production companies' material - despite its business arrangement with them.

BBC

The Home Office said it would appeal that decision, but was told on Wednesday that it had no grounds for such an appeal.

The New York Times

C1 German Banker Gets Reprieve A German court declared that it had no grounds to convict the chief executive of Deutsche Bank or three others on criminal charges in handing out rich bonuses.

The New York Times

It said that the current government's claim that it had no grounds to refuse the licences was "grossly inaccurate".

BBC

The attorney general's office had earlier concluded it had no grounds to bring Bazzi to Ireland because extradition proceedings would have to be initiated by the country where the crime was committed.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it has no grounds", ensure the context clearly identifies what "it" refers to, avoiding ambiguity. For instance, specify "the accusation has no grounds" instead of simply "it has no grounds" if the accusation is not immediately clear.

Common error

While "it has no grounds" is a perfectly valid phrase, it can sound overly formal or stiff in casual conversation. Consider using more relaxed alternatives like "there's no reason for it" or "it's just not true" in informal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it has no grounds" functions as a statement denying the validity or justification of something. Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability, indicating it's a standard construction for expressing a lack of foundation.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it has no grounds" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to express a lack of justification or basis. Ludwig's analysis of real-world examples from reputable sources like BBC and The New York Times confirms its validity. While suitable for formal and neutral contexts, it's important to consider less formal alternatives in casual conversation. Be sure to clearly specify what "it" refers to for unambiguous communication. Ludwig AI ensures that the phrase is usable in written English indicating that a claim, argument, or belief lacks a solid basis or justification.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it is without foundation

Emphasizes the absence of a solid base or supporting evidence.

it lacks justification

Focuses on the absence of a valid reason or excuse.

it is unsupported by evidence

Highlights the lack of empirical or factual support.

it is without merit

Indicates that the subject lacks inherent value or worth.

it is untenable

Suggests the subject is indefensible or unsustainable.

it is baseless

Directly states that there is no base or foundation.

it is groundless

Similar to 'baseless' emphasizing a lack of reason or cause.

it holds no water

An idiomatic expression suggesting the argument is weak and doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

it doesn't stand up to scrutiny

Focuses on the inability of something to withstand careful examination.

it is built on sand

Uses a metaphor to suggest instability and a high likelihood of failure.

FAQs

How can I use "it has no grounds" in a sentence?

You can use "it has no grounds" to express that a claim, argument, or belief lacks a solid basis or justification. For example, "The lawsuit it has no grounds and will likely be dismissed.".

What are some alternatives to "it has no grounds"?

Some alternatives include "it is baseless", "it lacks foundation", and "it is unsubstantiated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "it has no grounds" or "it doesn't have grounds"?

"It has no grounds" is generally considered more formal and grammatically sound. "It doesn't have grounds" is also acceptable, especially in more casual contexts, but the former carries a stronger sense of authority and finality.

What's the difference between "it has no grounds" and "it has no basis"?

While similar, "it has no grounds" often implies a lack of legal or logical justification, while "it has no basis" suggests a general lack of supporting facts or evidence. The choice depends on the specific context and the type of support that is lacking.