it has lost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it has lost" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something has been lost or is no longer possessed, typically referring to an object, quality, or state. Example: "After the storm, it has lost much of its original charm and beauty."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It has lost its base.

The New Yorker

But it has lost its regulatory powers.

The Economist

"It has lost its way," he says.

Independent

Recently, however, it has lost its direction.

The Economist

"It has lost its wits.

The New York Times

"It has lost its beauty.

The New York Times

(3) It has lost its founder.

Harvard Business Review

Now it has lost its emperor.

The Guardian - Sport

"But it has lost its still beauty".

The New York Times

It has lost its confidence, succumbed to bullying and pressure.

The New York Times - Magazine

In that sense, however, it has lost its way.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it has lost", ensure the subject 'it' is clearly defined in the context. This avoids ambiguity and makes your writing more precise.

Common error

Avoid using "it has lost" when the 'it' is ambiguous. Always ensure the reader knows what 'it' refers to; otherwise, rephrase for clarity. For example, instead of "The company struggled, and it has lost", specify: "The company struggled, and the company has lost market share."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it has lost" typically functions as the predicate of a sentence, indicating a state of deprivation or absence. The pronoun "it" acts as the subject, and "has lost" is a verb phrase in the present perfect tense. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it has lost" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to indicate a state of deprivation or absence. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and suitable for various contexts, especially in news, science, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in the subject 'it' and avoid ambiguity. Consider related alternatives like "it forfeited" or "it relinquished" for nuanced meanings. Remember, the phrase's effectiveness relies on its context and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it no longer possesses

States a current lack of ownership or control.

it forfeited

Emphasizes the relinquishing of something as a consequence.

it suffered the loss of

Focuses on the negative experience of losing something.

it relinquished

Focuses on the act of voluntarily giving something up.

it does not have

A more direct and simple way of stating the absence of something.

it surrendered

Implies yielding or giving way, often under pressure.

it was deprived of

Highlights the act of being forcibly stripped of something.

it is without

Indicates a deficiency or absence of something.

it experienced the absence of

Highlights the fact that something is missing.

it has been bereft of

Emphasizes a sense of loss and sadness.

FAQs

How can I use "it has lost" in a sentence?

You can use "it has lost" to indicate that something no longer possesses a certain quality, feature, or object. For example, "The organization has undergone several reforms and "it has lost" some of its original focus."

What are some alternatives to "it has lost"?

Alternatives to "it has lost" include phrases like "it forfeited", "it relinquished", or "it no longer possesses", depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "it has lost"?

Yes, "it has lost" is grammatically correct. It's the present perfect tense of the verb "lose", used with the pronoun "it". It indicates that something 'it' possessed in the past is no longer possessed in the present.

What's the difference between "it has lost" and "it lost"?

"It has lost" (present perfect) implies a connection to the present or a recent past, while "it lost" (simple past) simply states a past event without necessarily implying a direct impact on the present. For example, "It has lost its appeal" suggests it doesn't have appeal now, whereas "It lost its appeal" simply states that at some point in the past, it ceased to be appealing.