it had also

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it had also" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something in the sentence had an additional quality or characteristic. Example: "The book was not only entertaining, but it had also won numerous literary awards."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It had also taken down its "Contact Us" page.

Huffington Post

It had also developed some of its other benefits programs.

Wikipedia

It had also been filtered.

The New York Times - Food

It had also been hired by Abdeslam.

Independent

But it had also become more radical.

The New Yorker

It had also won from 2015-17.

The New York Times - Sports

It had also been done to him.

The New York Times - Magazine

But it had also adopted district cooling.

The New York Times

It had also been over 150 feet away.

The New York Times

It had also proved maybe the most exotic.

The New York Times

Several weeks earlier, it had also been set afire.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Vary your sentence structure by occasionally replacing "it had also" with synonyms like "additionally, it had" or "furthermore, it had" to enhance readability and avoid repetition.

Common error

Avoid shifting tenses when using "it had also". Ensure that the surrounding sentences maintain the past perfect tense to preserve grammatical coherence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it had also" functions as a conjunctive adverbial phrase, connecting two related clauses or sentences. It indicates that the second clause contains additional information about the subject discussed in the first clause. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and use across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Wiki

8%

Science

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it had also" functions as a conjunction phrase used to add additional information or details related to a previously mentioned subject. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and frequently appears in various contexts, most commonly in news and media sources. When employing this phrase, maintain tense consistency and aim for clear, coherent sentences. To avoid repetition, consider alternatives such as "additionally, it had" or "furthermore, it had". Overall, the phrase is suitable for neutral to formal writing and enhances the depth of descriptive narratives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it also had

Reorders the words but maintains the same core meaning.

additionally, it had

Adds a transitional word for emphasis.

furthermore, it had

Uses a stronger transitional word.

in addition, it had

Emphasizes the additive nature of the information.

it likewise had

Uses 'likewise' to show similarity.

it too had

Uses 'too' for brevity and informality.

similarly, it had

Highlights the similarity between the added information and the previous statement.

it correspondingly had

Highlights a direct correspondence between the additional information and the prior statement.

it also featured

Uses a different verb to convey 'had'.

it was also

Changes the structure to passive voice with similar meaning.

FAQs

How can I use "it had also" in a sentence?

Use "it had also" to add information about something already mentioned in the past, like in this sentence: "The restaurant was praised for its food; "it had also" a great wine list".

What are some alternatives to "it had also"?

Alternatives include phrases like "in addition it had", "furthermore it had", or "additionally it had", which serve a similar function of adding information.

Is it correct to say "it has also" instead of "it had also"?

"It has also" indicates present perfect tense, whereas "it had also" indicates past perfect tense. The correct choice depends on whether you're referring to something that happened before a specific point in the past ("it had also") or something that continues to be true or relevant now ("it has also").

What's the difference between "it also had" and "it had also"?

While both phrases are grammatically acceptable, "it had also" is generally preferred in formal writing to emphasize the additional aspect. "It also had" is more commonly used in informal contexts. There is a subtle difference in emphasis, where "it had also" directly connects to a previous statement.