it gave no

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it gave no" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that something did not provide or offer a particular thing or response. Example: "The report was lacking in detail; it gave no clear conclusions about the findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In its statement, it gave no hint of a future cut.

The Economist

It gave no reason for its action.

The Economist

It gave no reason for its refusal.

The New York Times

But it gave no indication of its plans in a statement Thursday.

The New York Times

It gave no time-frame for its third test.

BBC

It gave no more details but said its findings were sent to prosecutors investigating foul play.

Huffington Post

It gave no indication of when it might make its shares available to the public.

The New York Times

It gave no other details about the length or scope of its inquiry.

The New York Times

It gave no further details.

The New York Times

It gave no other information.

The New York Times - Tech

It gave no details.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it gave no", ensure the pronoun "it" clearly refers to a specific subject in the preceding context to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "it gave no" when a more specific verb would provide clarity; for instance, instead of "the analysis gave no conclusive results", consider "the analysis failed to conclude" for a stronger statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it gave no" functions as a clause element, specifically a subject-verb-object construction where "it" is the subject, "gave" is the verb, and "no" modifies an implied object. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and common usage of this phrase. The phrase is used to express the absence of something.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it gave no" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate the absence of information, details, or indication. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's prevalent in news and media reporting, conveying a sense of something lacking. While versatile, ensuring a clear antecedent for "it" and considering stronger verbs can enhance clarity. The related phrases such as "it provided no" or "it offered no" can be used as alternatives to avoid repetition, but the core meaning remains consistent. Always ensure that the context necessitates emphasizing the lack of provision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it provided no

Replaces "gave" with "provided", maintaining the same meaning of offering nothing.

it offered no

Substitutes "gave" with "offered", similarly expressing the lack of something provided.

it showed no

Changes "gave" to "showed", focusing on the absence of visible signs or indications.

it expressed no

Replaces "gave" with "expressed", highlighting the lack of communicated feelings or thoughts.

it furnished no

Uses "furnished" instead of "gave", implying a lack of provision of specific items or details.

it supplied no

Substitutes "gave" with "supplied", emphasizing the absence of provided resources or information.

it yielded no

Replaces "gave" with "yielded", suggesting the lack of a result or outcome.

it revealed no

Changes "gave" to "revealed", focusing on the absence of disclosed information.

it imparted no

Uses "imparted" instead of "gave", indicating a lack of conveyed knowledge or wisdom.

it extended no

Replaces "gave" with "extended", suggesting the absence of offered assistance or benefits.

FAQs

What does "it gave no" mean?

The phrase "it gave no" means that something did not provide, offer, or reveal a specific thing, such as information, details, or indication. It is used to express the absence of something expected or sought.

What can I say instead of "it gave no"?

You can use alternatives like "it provided no", "it offered no", or "it showed no depending on the context".

Is "it gave no" grammatically correct?

Yes, "it gave no" is grammatically correct. It follows standard English sentence structure, where "it" is the subject, "gave" is the verb, and "no" modifies the object (which is implied based on the context).

In what contexts is "it gave no" commonly used?

The phrase "it gave no" is commonly used in news reports, formal writing, and general communication to indicate a lack of information, details, or any kind of response or offering. For example, "The company released a statement, but "it gave no indication of its future plans"".