it allocates for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it allocates for" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct usage would typically be "it allocates" or "it allocates to." Example: "The budget allocates funds for new equipment."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

L.A. spends at least $51 million more in Wall Street in fees than it allocates for its entire budget for the Bureau of Street Services.

Huffington Post

But some advocates of coverage say the true measure of the administration's commitment is the money it allocates for drug benefits in its budget next year.

The New York Times

Paying the Russians to do the blending down faster but to store the extra reactor fuel, say the researchers, would get the job done more quickly and without flooding the civilian uranium market.The Harvard study also unfavourably compares the $1 billion or so the Bush administration spends on threat-reduction efforts in Russia with the $38 billion it allocates for homeland security.

The Economist

West London clinical commissioning group, which runs the integrated dementia service for health and local authority social care in Kensington and Chelsea, says any personal budget it allocates for an individual's care would take account of the market rates for care in the area.

The Guardian

But a new school financing formula being proposed by Gov. Jon S. Corzine may vastly reshape the way the state divides the nearly $1 billion a year it allocates for special education, directing a larger share of the money to special education students in poor districts.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Go to Article from CNet News.com » The deal would be somewhat surprising given Dell's historical reluctance to grow through acquistions, and the heavy marketing budget it allocated for its own high-end XPS PC lineup, writes CNet's Tom Kravitz.

The New York Times

Overall, Morgan set aside about $3.2 billion, a 67 percent drop from the $9.8 billion it allocated for losses a year ago.

The New York Times

BRUSSELS — The European Union has failed to get value for the €1 billion it allocated for aiding Egypt during the past five years, the bloc's main audit authority said Monday.

The New York Times

In her first address to the legislature, Collins asked for an additional $324 million from the Kentucky General Assembly, most of it allocated for education.

Wikipedia

Starbucks is planning to change the way it allocates its costs for tax purposes in a way that should see it paying corporation tax in the UK for almost the first time, I have learnt.

BBC

It allocates $10m for a new joint agency headquarters.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the construction "it allocates for". It's grammatically incorrect and considered non-standard English.

Common error

A frequent error is adding "for" after "allocate" when it is not needed. Remember that "allocate" directly takes the object being assigned. Using "it allocates resources for" is often redundant; instead, prefer "it allocates resources to" or just "it allocates resources".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it allocates for" functions as a verb phrase aiming to express the distribution or assignment of resources. However, Ludwig AI flags this construction as grammatically incorrect. The correct usage should either be "it allocates" or "it allocates to".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it allocates for" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI analysis confirms this, recommending the use of either "it allocates" or "it allocates to" instead. While the phrase appears in some online sources, its frequency is rare, and it should be avoided in formal writing. The correct usage ensures clarity and adherence to standard English grammar. Focus on using "it allocates resources" or "it allocates resources to [purpose]" for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it allocates

Removes the unnecessary preposition "for", resulting in a grammatically correct phrase.

it allocates to

Replaces "for" with the correct preposition "to", creating a grammatically sound phrase.

it assigns to

Replaces "allocates" with "assigns", focusing on the act of assigning something to a specific recipient or purpose.

it sets aside for

Replaces "allocates" with "sets aside", indicating a reservation of resources for a specific purpose.

it budgets for

Uses "budgets" instead of "allocates", emphasizing a financial allocation.

it earmarks for

Substitutes "allocates" with "earmarks", suggesting a specific designation of funds.

it designates for

Substitutes "allocates" with "designates", retaining a similar meaning but still including the incorrect "for".

it dedicates to

Replaces "allocates" with "dedicates", implying a commitment of resources.

it appropriates for

Substitutes "allocates" with "appropriates", emphasizing the authorization of funds for a specific use. Still contains the incorrect "for".

funds are allocated for it

Rephrases the sentence in passive voice. Funds now become the subject of the phrase.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "it allocates" in a sentence?

Use "it allocates" followed by the resource being assigned, for example, "The budget "it allocates" funds for education". You can also say "it allocates funds to education".

What's a good alternative to "it allocates for"?

Instead of "it allocates for", use alternatives such as "it allocates" or "it assigns to". The specific choice depends on the context.

Is "it allocates for" grammatically correct?

No, "it allocates for" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct forms are "it allocates" (something) or it allocates (something) "to" (someone/something).

What's the difference between "it allocates" and "it designates for"?

"It allocates" means to distribute resources for a specific purpose, while "it designates for" (though less common and potentially incorrect if 'for' is unnecessary) implies assigning something to a particular purpose or role. However, "it designates" followed by the object would be more appropriate.