is worthless

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is worthless" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express that something has no value or is of no use. Example: "After reviewing the report, I concluded that the data provided is worthless for our analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The ESOP is worthless.

The New York Times

The currency is worthless.

The Economist

"His word is worthless".

The New York Times

Their money is worthless.

The Washington Post

Her intellectual property is worthless.

The New Yorker

One sample alone is worthless.

The New York Times - Magazine

Miliband says Cameron's negotiation is worthless.

The Guardian

That doesn't mean Newsweek is worthless.

The New York Times

"So in my book, it is worthless".

The New York Times - Arts

"That kit lens is worthless," she said.

The New York Times

But, just only to build business strategies is worthless.

Expert Systems with Applications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is worthless", ensure the context clearly defines what standard of value or utility is being applied. For example, specify if you are referring to monetary value, practical use, or emotional significance.

Common error

Avoid using "is worthless" when a milder term like "is less valuable" or "has limited use" would be more accurate. Overstating worthlessness can damage your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is worthless" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state or condition of the subject as lacking value or worth. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase effectively conveys the absence of utility or merit.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is worthless" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression used to convey that something lacks value, utility, or significance. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage and widespread presence across diverse sources. Predominantly found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, it serves the purpose of expressing a negative evaluation. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity regarding the standard of value and avoid overstating the degree of worthlessness for maintaining precision and impact in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is of no value

Replaces 'worthless' with a more formal and explicit expression of lacking value.

has no worth

A more concise way of stating that something lacks value.

is without merit

Focuses on the lack of positive qualities or deservingness.

is of little use

Emphasizes the lack of practical application or benefit.

is inconsequential

Highlights the lack of importance or significance.

is meaningless

Stresses the absence of meaning or purpose.

is insignificant

Similar to 'inconsequential', but can also refer to size or amount.

is pointless

Focuses on the lack of a useful outcome or purpose.

is ineffective

Highlights the lack of ability to produce a desired result.

serves no purpose

Emphasizes the lack of function or utility.

FAQs

How can I use "is worthless" in a sentence?

You can use "is worthless" to describe something that has no value, use, or significance. For example, "The old currency "is worthless" after the country adopted a new monetary system."

What can I say instead of "is worthless"?

You can use alternatives like "is of no value", "has no worth", or "is insignificant" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "are worthless" instead of "is worthless"?

Yes, use "are worthless" when referring to plural nouns. For example, "Those old coins "are worthless"."

What's the difference between "is worthless" and "is useless"?

"Is worthless" generally implies a lack of value, while "is useless" implies a lack of practical application. Something can be worthless (having no monetary value) but not useless (it might have sentimental value), and vice versa.