is validated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is validated with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to say that something is proven to be correct by an external factor. For example: The information provided in the report is validated with data from a reliable source.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The effect is validated with experimental testing.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The model is validated with numerical calculations.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

The model is validated with experimental data.

Chemical Engineering Science

The method is validated with Z -> b (b) over bar decays.

Princeton University

The stack model is validated with the experimental data.

Applied Energy

The numerical simulation model is validated with experimental results.

Journal of Power Sources

The model is validated with the experimental data.

Applied Thermal Engineering

The proposed scheme is validated with extensive simulations.

Ad Hoc Networks

The approach proposed is validated with two simulation use cases.

Computers in Industry

The CFD model is validated with data from field measurements.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Closed-loop performance is validated with the experimental data.

Control Engineering Practice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is validated with", ensure that the 'with' clause clearly identifies the specific data, method, or evidence used for validation. This enhances clarity and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "is validated with" without specifying what the validation is based on. For example, instead of saying 'The model is validated with data', specify 'The model is validated with experimental data from the 2024 study'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is validated with" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a particular model, method, or result has been proven or confirmed by external data or evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it suggests that something's correctness is shown through an external factor.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is validated with" serves as a crucial tool for establishing credibility in technical and scientific writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates that a claim or model has been verified through external evidence, such as experimental data or simulations. The phrase exhibits a formal and scientific register, predominantly appearing in academic papers and research reports. Key to effective use is specifying the exact method or data used for validation, thereby enhancing clarity and trustworthiness. With its frequent usage and grammatical correctness, "is validated with" remains a staple for researchers and technical writers aiming to solidify their findings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is confirmed by

Focuses on the corroboration of something by another source.

is supported by

Highlights the backing or reinforcement provided by evidence.

is verified by

Emphasizes the process of checking or proving the truth of something.

is substantiated by

Stresses the provision of evidence to prove the validity of something.

is corroborated by

Indicates that something is strengthened or confirmed by independent sources.

is demonstrated through

Focuses on showing or proving something through a particular method or example.

is justified by

Highlights the reasons or evidence that support something.

is proven by

Emphasizes the conclusive evidence that establishes the truth of something.

is assessed through

Focuses on the evaluation process used to validate something.

is authenticated by

Highlights the act of confirming the genuineness or validity of something.

FAQs

How can I use "is validated with" in a sentence?

Use "is validated with" to indicate that a claim, method, or model has been proven correct or effective through specific evidence. For example, 'The proposed algorithm "is validated with" a publicly available dataset'.

What are some alternatives to "is validated with"?

Alternatives include "is confirmed by", "is supported by", and "is verified by". The best choice depends on the specific context and the type of evidence used.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "validate"?

Both active and passive voice are acceptable. Active voice (e.g., 'Experiments validate the model') is more direct, while passive voice (e.g., 'The model "is validated with" experiments') emphasizes the model being validated.

What type of data can be used to validate something?

Validation can be performed using various types of data, including experimental results, numerical simulations, analytical solutions, and real-world data sets. The choice depends on the nature of what "is validated with".