is understood to include

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is understood to include" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when clarifying that a certain definition or concept encompasses additional elements beyond what is explicitly stated. Example: "The term 'wildlife' is understood to include all living organisms in their natural habitats, not just animals."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

24 human-written examples

Blazer's report to Fifa is understood to include sworn affidavits from Concacaf members at the meeting.

The Guardian - Sport

The dossier is understood to include emails and correspondence with Mr Hunt's office and News Corp.

Independent

The evidence is understood to include social media messages allegedly written by Baghdadi and a covert recording.

The Guardian

The £2.6bn total is understood to include the cost of all non-payroll, bank and agency staff combined.

The Guardian

Their number is understood to include two former Liverpool managers, Rafa Benítez and Brendan Rodgers, and the former Everton coach David Moyes.

The Guardian - Sport

As for jurisconsults, that curious term is understood to include distinguished academics and practitioners rather than a junior member of the bar who taught part-time.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

The individuals are not identified, but are understood to include Graham Norton and Gary Lineker.

The Guardian

These are understood to include the possibility of some form of commercial tie-up with Five.

The Guardian

Ramsay's negotiations with ITV are understood to include the return of a big format similar to Hell's Kitchen.

The Guardian

The English prohibition was understood to include relations between men and women as well as relations between men and men...

The New York Times

Other bidders are understood to include UTV, which owns TalkSport and the Ulster ITV franchise, and private equity firm Vitruvian Partners.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is understood to include", ensure that the included elements are logically related and clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For instance, instead of saying "The project is understood to include various tasks", specify what those tasks are: "The project is understood to include planning, execution, and monitoring phases".

Common error

Avoid using "is understood to include" as a vague placeholder without providing specific details. For example, avoid saying "The package is understood to include everything you need". Instead, clarify what is included: "The package is understood to include a manual, software, and cables".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is understood to include" functions as a connector, indicating that something encompasses or comprises specific elements. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for written English and is useful for clarifying the scope of definitions. Examples in Ludwig demonstrate its application across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

26%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is understood to include" is a versatile connector used to clarify that a concept encompasses particular elements. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English. It appears most frequently in news and media, science, and formal business contexts. For better usage, ensure that the included elements are clearly defined, and avoid using the phrase as a vague placeholder. Related phrases include "is taken to mean" and "is considered to encompass". Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating its application in various scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is defined as comprising

This phrase provides a formal definition, specifying the components that make up something.

is recognized to encompass

This highlights that something is widely acknowledged to include specific elements.

is considered to encompass

This phrase highlights the scope or range of something, suggesting a comprehensive inclusion.

is deemed to incorporate

This alternative suggests that something has been officially or formally considered to include particular elements.

is meant to incorporate

This option suggests a deliberate intention to include specific elements.

is known to cover

This phrase stresses the known or recognized scope of something.

is interpreted to cover

This alternative focuses on the extent to which something applies or is relevant.

can be said to involve

This suggests that something necessarily entails or implicates certain aspects.

is taken to mean

This alternative emphasizes the interpretation or implication of something, rather than direct inclusion.

effectively constitutes

This alternative implies that certain elements combine to form a whole, functioning as its constituents.

FAQs

How can I use "is understood to include" in a sentence?

You can use "is understood to include" to clarify that a definition or concept encompasses additional elements beyond what is explicitly stated. For example, "The term 'healthcare' "is understood to include" preventive care, treatment, and rehabilitation services".

What are some alternatives to "is understood to include"?

Alternatives include "is taken to mean", "is considered to encompass", or "is defined as comprising", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "is understood to include" or "is known to include"?

Both are correct, but "is understood to include" suggests a broader, possibly implicit understanding, while "is known to include" implies explicit knowledge or documentation. Choose the one that best fits the context.

What's the difference between "is understood to include" and "is required to include"?

"Is understood to include" implies a general understanding or convention, while "is required to include" suggests a mandatory inclusion based on rules or regulations. For instance, "The report "is understood to include" a summary", versus "The report "is required to include" a financial statement".