is to keep

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is to keep" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a purpose or intention, often in the context of explaining what someone aims to do or maintain. Example: "The main goal of this project is to keep the environment clean and sustainable."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

One is to keep building.

The Economist

"My job is to keep traffic moving.

The Economist

"The only way is to keep watching.

BBC

The second strategy is to keep momentum.

The New York Times

The challenge is to keep it so.

The Economist

Their answer is to keep Brussels out.

The Economist

The key is to keep at it.

Harvard University

What's important is to keep on researching".

Independent

His job is to keep San Francisco Inc.

The New York Times

Another is to keep out intruders.

The New York Times

The trick is to keep going".

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is to keep", ensure it clearly conveys the intention or purpose within the sentence. It's most effective when followed by a concise and specific verb phrase.

Common error

Avoid using "is to keep" repeatedly within long, convoluted sentences. This can lead to redundancy and weaken the overall impact. Break down complex ideas into simpler statements for better clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is to keep" functions primarily as a purpose clause introducer. It connects a subject with its intended action or objective, explaining what the subject aims to achieve or maintain. This is consistent with Ludwig's analysis, and is well represented in examples of different types.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Academia

32%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is to keep" serves as a versatile connector, expressing purpose or intention across various contexts. Ludwig's analysis confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage, particularly in news and academic settings. While the phrase maintains a neutral register, it's crucial to avoid overuse in complex sentences for clarity. Consider alternatives like "aims to maintain" or "intends to preserve" to add nuance to your writing. As demonstrated by Ludwig, this phrase is a common and effective way to articulate objectives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

aims to maintain

Focuses on maintaining a current state, shifting the emphasis from action to preservation.

intends to preserve

Highlights the intention to safeguard something, adding a layer of protection.

seeks to retain

Emphasizes the effort to hold onto something, suggesting a possible challenge.

endeavors to uphold

Implies a commitment to support or defend something, suggesting a moral or ethical dimension.

strives to conserve

Focuses on the effort to carefully manage resources, often in an environmental context.

works to sustain

Highlights ongoing effort to support or prolong something, adding an element of continuity.

plans to safeguard

Emphasizes the strategic aspect of protecting something, suggesting a proactive approach.

manages to preserve

Highlights the ability to maintain something despite difficulties.

arranges to protect

Indicates a proactive effort to protect something from harm or damage.

takes steps to maintain

Highlights a series of actions taken to ensure something continues in its current state.

FAQs

How can I use "is to keep" in a sentence?

Use "is to keep" to clearly state the purpose or intention of an action. For example, "The goal "is to keep" expenses low" indicates that maintaining low expenses is the primary objective.

What are some alternatives to "is to keep"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "aims to maintain", "intends to preserve", or "seeks to retain" as alternatives to ""is to keep"".

Is it grammatically correct to use "is to keep"?

Yes, ""is to keep"" is grammatically correct when used to express a purpose or objective. For instance, "The strategy "is to keep" the team focused."

When is "is to maintain" a better choice than "is to keep"?

"Is to maintain" might be preferred when the focus is on preserving an existing state or condition, rather than simply continuing an action. For example, "The priority "is to maintain" the system's stability", while "The priority "is to keep" the system running" focuses on action.