Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
is to blame for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "is to blame for" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to assign responsibility or fault for a certain event or situation. Here is an example: "John is to blame for the project's failure. He did not properly communicate with the team and missed important deadlines."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Who is to blame for this mess?
News & Media
And who is to blame for that?
News & Media
Who is to blame for all this?
News & Media
Drug violence is to blame for narcocorridos".
News & Media
Erdogan is to blame for that".
News & Media
Who is to blame for this debacle?
News & Media
"No one is to blame for anything.
News & Media
Nobody is to blame for his predicament.
News & Media
Who is to blame for this?
News & Media
Who is to blame for this disaster?
News & Media
Who is to blame for that?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "is to blame for" when you want to specifically highlight fault or culpability. For general responsibility, consider "is responsible for".
Common error
While "is to blame for" is acceptable, it can sound accusatory in formal writing. Opt for more neutral alternatives like "is responsible for" or "contributed to" to maintain a professional tone.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "is to blame for" functions as a predicative expression that assigns fault or responsibility for a particular outcome. Ludwig examples show its widespread use in contexts where accountability is being determined.
Frequent in
News & Media
63%
Academia
13%
Formal & Business
8%
Less common in
Science
6%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "is to blame for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to assign fault or responsibility. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. While it is widely used across various contexts, especially in News & Media, writers should be mindful of the potential accusatory tone and consider more neutral alternatives in formal settings. Ludwig examples illustrate its consistent application in determining accountability, making it a versatile phrase for both formal and informal communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
is responsible for
Focuses on general responsibility rather than explicit fault.
is accountable for
Emphasizes the obligation to answer for the consequences.
is at fault for
Directly indicates error or wrongdoing.
bears the responsibility for
Highlights the weight of the responsibility.
is liable for
Implies legal or financial responsibility.
is culpable for
Suggests moral or ethical blameworthiness.
is the cause of
Identifies the direct source or origin of something.
is the reason for
Explains the rationale or justification behind an event.
is the origin of
Pinpoints the starting point or genesis of something.
is behind
Suggests a hidden or indirect involvement.
FAQs
How do I use "is to blame for" in a sentence?
The phrase "is to blame for" is used to assign responsibility or fault for something. For example, "The manager "is to blame for" the project delays because of poor planning".
What can I say instead of "is to blame for"?
You can use alternatives like "is responsible for", "is accountable for", or "is at fault for", depending on the specific context and desired nuance.
Is it correct to say "are to blame for"?
Yes, "are to blame for" is correct when referring to multiple entities. For example, "The company's policies "are to blame for" the declining sales".
What's the difference between "is to blame for" and "is responsible for"?
"Is to blame for" specifically indicates fault or culpability, while "is responsible for" simply denotes a duty or obligation. Someone can be responsible for something without necessarily being at fault. "The supervisor "is responsible for" the team's performance, but the economic downturn "is to blame for" the company's overall losses".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested