is the responsibility of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is the responsibility of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate who is accountable for a particular task or duty. Example: "The maintenance of the equipment is the responsibility of the facilities team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This is the responsibility of the writer.

The New Yorker

(Control is the responsibility of the referee.

The New Yorker

"It is the responsibility of our generation".

The New York Times

What is the responsibility of the Supreme Court?

The New Yorker

That is the responsibility of Pakistan".

The New York Times

This is the responsibility of the government.

The New York Times

"This is the responsibility of governance".

The New York Times

This is the responsibility of the owner.

The Guardian

It is the responsibility of the builders.

The Guardian - Money

It is the responsibility of both.

University of California, Berkeley

Broadcasting is the responsibility of the Committee for Television and Radio.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is the responsibility of" to clearly define who is accountable for a specific task, project, or outcome. This avoids ambiguity and ensures that tasks are completed efficiently.

Common error

Don't use "is the responsibility of" without clearly specifying who is responsible. Vague assignments lead to confusion and inaction. Always name a specific person, team, or department.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is the responsibility of" serves as a grammatical construct used to assign accountability or duty. It clearly indicates who is in charge or liable for a specific task, action, or outcome. Ludwig AI validates the grammatical correctness and common usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is the responsibility of" is a versatile and commonly used way to assign accountability across various contexts. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and particularly useful for clearly defining who is in charge of a task or duty. While its register is generally neutral, it fits well in formal, professional, and informal settings. For alternative phrasings, you can consider options like "falls under the purview of", "is accountable to", or "is tasked with". By using this phrase precisely, you can avoid ambiguity and ensure efficient task completion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is in charge of

Indicates having control or command over something.

rests with

Indicates that the responsibility is placed or conferred upon someone.

is accountable to

Highlights the obligation to answer for actions or decisions.

is obligated to

Stresses a legal or moral requirement to do something.

is tasked with

Focuses on the assignment of a specific duty or task.

is liable for

Focuses on legal responsibility for potential damages or losses.

falls under the purview of

Emphasizes the scope of authority or control.

is incumbent upon

Highlights a duty or responsibility that is morally binding.

lies within the duties of

Formally specifies that something is part of someone's job or responsibilities.

is down to

Informally indicates that someone is responsible for something.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "is the responsibility of" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "falls under the purview of", "is incumbent upon", or "is obligated to" depending on the specific context.

What's a more casual way to say "is the responsibility of"?

In informal contexts, you might use phrases like "is in charge of", "is down to", or "rests with".

Is it always necessary to explicitly state who "is the responsibility of" something?

While not always mandatory, explicitly stating who "is the responsibility of" a task or duty helps to avoid confusion and ensures accountability. It's particularly important in professional and formal settings.

How does "is the responsibility of" differ from "is accountable to"?

"Is the responsibility of" implies a duty to perform a task, while "is accountable to" suggests an obligation to answer for the outcomes or consequences of actions. The former focuses on the task itself, the latter on the results.