is the reason for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'is the reason for' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use 'is the reason for' when you want to explain why something happened or exists. For example: "The lack of financial resources is the reason for the delays."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

What is the reason for that?

The New York Times

That is the reason for it.

The New York Times

But what is the reason for this?

The New York Times

What is the reason for revitalizing Chiwere?

Princeton University

That is the reason for my sadness".

The New York Times

What is the reason for the disparity?

The New York Times

That is the reason for having conditionality.

The Guardian - Business

What is the reason for this development?

The Guardian - Opinion

This is the reason for our resistance.

The New York Times

That is the reason for Megan's Law".

The New York Times

That is the reason for his success".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is the reason for", ensure that the cause-and-effect relationship is clear and logical to enhance the clarity of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "is the reason for" in overly passive constructions that obscure the actual cause. Be direct and specific about what is causing the effect you are describing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is the reason for" functions primarily as a causal connector, linking a cause or explanation to its effect. It's used to provide justification or rationale. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent use across various text types.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

32%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

9%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "is the reason for" is a versatile causal connector, frequently used to establish clear cause-and-effect relationships across various contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its high frequency in sources ranging from news and media to scientific and academic texts. While grammatically straightforward, ensure the connection between cause and effect is logically sound. While alternatives exist, "is the reason for" provides a direct and easily understood explanation, making it a valuable phrase for clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is the cause of

Emphasizes direct causation rather than a more general explanation.

is attributable to

Suggests that something can be assigned or credited to a specific cause or factor.

is due to

Indicates a direct result or consequence of something else.

stems from

Implies that something originates or develops from a particular source or origin.

is a consequence of

Highlights the outcome or result of a specific action or event.

is the result of

Focuses on the outcome or effect produced by a particular cause.

accounts for

Explains or provides a reason for something.

explains why

Directly states the reason behind a particular phenomenon or situation.

justifies

Provides a rationale or basis for something.

the rationale behind is

Indicates the underlying logic or justification for an action or decision.

FAQs

How can I use "is the reason for" in a sentence?

Use "is the reason for" to clearly state the cause or explanation behind a particular outcome or situation. For example, "The budget cuts "is the reason for" the project's delay".

What can I say instead of "is the reason for"?

You can use alternatives like "is the cause of", "is due to", or "stems from" depending on the context.

Which is correct: "the reason is because" or "is the reason for"?

While "the reason is because" is commonly used, it is often considered redundant. Using "is the reason for" is a more concise and grammatically preferred alternative in many formal contexts.

What's the difference between "is the reason for" and "is due to"?

"Is the reason for" is a more general phrase to explain why something happens, while "is due to" often implies a direct or immediate consequence. Both can be used to indicate causality, but the nuance may differ based on the specific context.