Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
is that with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'is that with' is correct and can be used in written English.
It is usually used to ask a question about something that has been previously mentioned. For example: I know you are busy, is that with work?.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
The point is that 9... Kf8 10 Qd8 is mate.
News & Media
Why is that? 1. Reciprocity.
Science & Research
The reality is that: 1.
News & Media
Being that 200 is the minimum.
Academia
Reports are that 15 demonstrators were arrested.
News & Media
Or is that 39?
News & Media
How is that #42?
News & Media
How cool is that?! 5.
News & Media
One point was that 30..
News & Media
"…It's that Catch-22.
News & Media
That's 8 to 10 inches.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "is that with", ensure the context clearly establishes what "that" refers to, and what relationship you are trying to define. Avoid ambiguity by being specific.
Common error
Avoid using "is that with" if the referent of "that" is not immediately clear in the preceding text. This can lead to confusion for the reader.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "is that with" functions as an interrogative phrase. It's used to inquire about the association or inclusion of something with another item or group. Ludwig indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "is that with" is a grammatically sound, though somewhat uncommon, interrogative construction used to inquire about association, inclusion, or connection. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness. Given its potential for ambiguity, it's crucial to ensure the context clearly identifies the referent of "that" to maintain clarity. Alternatives such as "is that related to" or "does that include" might offer improved explicitness in many situations.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
is that associated with
Highlights the relationship or connection between two things.
is that related to
Emphasizes a direct relationship or connection.
is that connected to
Indicates a link or pathway between two elements.
does that involve
Focuses on involvement or inclusion, rather than a simple association.
does that include
Directly asks if something is part of a larger whole.
is that tied to
Suggests a strong dependency or association.
is that accompanied by
Suggests that something is paired or goes together with something else.
does that pertain to
Focuses on relevance or applicability.
is that in conjunction with
Implies a collaborative or simultaneous action.
is that a component of
Highlights that something forms part of a larger structure.
FAQs
How can I use "is that with" in a sentence?
The phrase "is that with" is used to inquire if something is included, related, or associated with something else. For example, "I know you are working on the budget; "is that with" the finance team?"
What can I say instead of "is that with"?
You can use alternatives like "is that related to", "does that include", or "is that associated with" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "is that with" or "is that included with"?
"Is that with" is grammatically correct, but less common. "Is that included with" is more explicit and often preferred for clarity.
What's the difference between "is that with" and "is that for"?
"Is that with" implies association or inclusion, while "is that for" indicates purpose or intended recipient. For example, "Is that with the project team?" asks about membership, whereas "is that for the project team?" asks about intended use or delivery.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested