is sufficient grounds for

USAGE SUMMARY

"is sufficient grounds for" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when there is enough evidence to justify a decision or course of action. For example: "His dishonesty is sufficient grounds for dismissal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

Another issue raised by Ms. Ibrahim's case is whether inclusion on the no-fly list is sufficient grounds for arrest.

The New York Times

Under the new rules put in place after Geller's 2012 campaign, that is sufficient grounds for the MTA to refuse to run an ad.

The Guardian

"And we want to have some way of going to our government and possibly to our courts and saying, 'Look, I shouldn't be on that list.' " Another issue raised by Ms. Ibrahim's case is whether inclusion on the no-fly list is sufficient grounds for arrest.

The New York Times

Epidural does not increase the risk of C-section, ACOG concluded, and maternal request is sufficient grounds for administration.

HuffPost

While in the end, the aims of both the military and Peace Corps still remain quite different, this strange convergence between their means is sufficient grounds for contemplation.

Huffington Post

Equally obviously, there is no rule that universities must decide that the mere fact of being outrageous is sufficient grounds for an invitation, but the letter clearly refers to "disinviting".

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

In the face of this record, we can hardly conclude that this error is sufficient ground for reversal.

Cornell University

The refusal of the state court to afford the protection is sufficient ground for this court to take jurisdiction to review the judgment of that court, and I dissent from my associates in their declining to take such jurisdiction.

Cornell University

Arseniy Yatseniuk, one of the opposition leaders, is already saying that Mr Yanukovych's betrayal of national interests is sufficient ground for impeachment.Ordinary Ukrainians have already come out on Maidan, Kiev's main square and the stage of the 2004 revolution, to protest against Mr Yanukovych's decision.

The Economist

This finding is sufficient ground for analysing liver cirrhoses with a panel of microsatellite markers covering the entire MDM2 gene locus to more accurately characterise chromosomal imbalance at chromosome 12q13-14.

British Journal of Cancer

There seemed to be sufficient grounds for arresting people before now".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is sufficient grounds for", ensure that the grounds you are referring to are clearly defined and logically connected to the action or decision they justify.

Common error

Avoid using "is sufficient grounds for" when the justification is weak or subjective. Ensure that the grounds are objectively reasonable and verifiable, rather than merely a matter of opinion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is sufficient grounds for" functions as a predicative expression, indicating that a particular reason or set of facts provides adequate justification for a subsequent action or decision. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is suitable for use in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Academia

30%

Science

26%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "is sufficient grounds for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to express that something provides adequate justification for a particular action or decision. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is appropriate for written English. The phrase appears most frequently in News & Media, Academia, and Science contexts. Related phrases include "is an adequate basis for" and "provides ample reason for". When using this phrase, ensure that the grounds are clearly defined and logically connected to the action or decision they justify to avoid overstating the sufficiency of the grounds.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is an adequate basis for

Replaces "grounds" with "basis", indicating a foundation for something.

constitutes adequate justification for

Replaces "sufficient grounds" with a more formal synonym for justification.

is a valid rationale for

Substitutes "grounds" with "rationale", implying a reasoned explanation.

provides ample reason for

Substitutes "sufficient grounds" with "ample reason", altering the phrase structure.

represents enough cause for

Changes "sufficient grounds" to "enough cause", providing a more direct alternative.

establishes adequate justification for

Emphasizes the act of establishing justification.

warrants the need for

Changes the phrase to focus on the necessity created by the grounds.

justifies the action of

Rephrases to emphasize the justification of an action.

is deemed a good reason for

Replaces 'sufficient grounds' with 'good reason', offering a simpler alternative.

fulfills the requirements for

Changes the phrase to focus on meeting specific requirements.

FAQs

How can I use "is sufficient grounds for" in a sentence?

You can use "is sufficient grounds for" to indicate that something provides enough justification for a particular action or decision. For example, "The evidence presented "is sufficient grounds for" an investigation".

What are some alternatives to "is sufficient grounds for"?

Alternatives include "is an adequate basis for", "provides ample reason for", or "justifies the action of" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "is sufficient grounds for"?

It's appropriate when you want to state that a particular fact, reason, or piece of evidence adequately justifies a specific action or conclusion. Be sure the justification is strong and logically sound.

What's the difference between "is sufficient grounds for" and "is reasonable grounds for"?

"Is sufficient grounds for" implies a higher level of justification than "is reasonable grounds for". "Sufficient" suggests the justification is compelling and adequate, while "reasonable" suggests it's merely plausible or acceptable.