is strongly rejected

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is strongly rejected" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is firmly opposed or not accepted, often in formal or academic contexts. Example: "The proposal for the new policy is strongly rejected by the committee due to its potential negative impact."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

28 human-written examples

Specifically, a dade comprised of the mouse opossums Marmosa, Micoureus, and Marmosops is strongly rejected by log-likelihood analysis, contrary to expectations from some current clas-sifications.

University of California, Berkeley

As a result, the null hypothesis, based on the assumption that all the parameter coefficients are zeros, is strongly rejected and hence the model is significant.

Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

The hypothesis that spouses have the same marginal propensities to spend on children's goods and other consumption is strongly rejected (p-value 0.000).

IZA Journal of Labor Economics

The results show that the null hypothesis – that average abnormal returns are equal across all days of the week – is strongly rejected as all p-values in Panel B of Table 2 (both the homoscedasticity and heteroscedasticity cases) are close to zero.

Financial Innovation

In this case, the BIC3 procedure again selected only one common factor and there is clear evidence of a unit root in the common factor, since the unit root null is not rejected with the ( {text{ADF}}_{{hat{F}}}^{c} ) test and the stationarity null is strongly rejected with the ( {text{KPSS}}_{{hat{F}}}^{c} ) statistic.

Latin American Economic Review

When observing the estimators provided in Table 1, one finds that the significance of the standard deviation of the trend associated with the low volatility regime ((sigma _{eta _{1}}^{2})) is strongly rejected, as well as the standard deviation of the measurement equation ((sigma _{omega})).

Latin American Economic Review

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

32 human-written examples

Now, he is strongly rejecting opposition demands that he give up power, as anti-government demonstrators continue to push for his ouster.

The Washington Post

The GCA model fit the experimental response surface extremely well (p for rejection = 0.79), whereas the TEF model was visibly inappropriate and was strongly rejected (p for rejection = 4 × 10−5).

Environmental Health Perspectives

This was strongly rejected by Cazenove.

Independent

The leaked documents show some countries "expressed annoyance" that the US just resubmitted a text that had been strongly rejected previously.

The Guardian

According to local leaders, insurgents had met with Jaghori elders in recent months, asking them to accept Taliban rule, but had been strongly rejected.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is strongly rejected" to convey firm disagreement or opposition to a hypothesis, idea, or proposal, particularly in formal writing or when emphasizing the strength of the rejection.

Common error

Avoid using "is strongly rejected" in casual conversation or informal writing, as it can sound overly formal or stilted. Opt for more natural alternatives like "didn't like" or "disagreed with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is strongly rejected" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject (e.g., hypothesis, proposal) has faced significant opposition. As Ludwig AI confirms, this expression is grammatically correct and frequently appears in formal contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

62%

News & Media

26%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is strongly rejected" is a grammatically correct and common expression used to convey significant opposition or disagreement, particularly in formal and scientific contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for academic papers, research reports, and official statements. While versatile, its formality may make it unsuitable for casual conversation, where alternatives like "was disagreed with" or "wasn't accepted" might be preferable. The expression's purpose is to emphasize the strength of the rejection, with alternatives like "is firmly opposed" and "is vehemently denied" offering nuanced ways to express similar sentiments. In summary, "is strongly rejected" is a robust and effective choice for formal writing when conveying decisive opposition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is firmly opposed

Emphasizes resolute opposition rather than outright rejection.

is categorically refuted

Implies a clear and unambiguous denial or disproof.

is decisively turned down

Emphasizes the conclusiveness of the rejection.

is vehemently denied

Focuses on denial with strong emotion or force.

is flatly refused

Suggests a direct and uncompromising refusal.

meets with strong disapproval

Highlights the negative reaction and lack of acceptance.

is dismissed outright

Highlights that the rejection is immediate and without consideration.

faces considerable resistance

Focuses on the opposition encountered rather than complete rejection.

is thoroughly discredited

Focuses on the loss of credibility or reputation.

is unacceptable

Indicates that the subject is not satisfactory or allowable.

FAQs

How can I use "is strongly rejected" in a sentence?

The phrase "is strongly rejected" typically indicates a firm disagreement or opposition to a particular idea, hypothesis, or proposal. For example: "The proposed amendment "is strongly rejected" by the committee."

What are some alternatives to "is strongly rejected"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "is firmly opposed", "is vehemently denied", or "is categorically refuted".

Is it appropriate to use "is strongly rejected" in everyday conversation?

While grammatically correct, "is strongly rejected" is more suited to formal writing and discussions. In everyday conversation, simpler alternatives like "wasn't accepted" or "was disagreed with" may be more appropriate.

What's the difference between "is strongly rejected" and "is weakly rejected"?

"Is strongly rejected" implies a firm and decisive opposition, whereas using "weakly" suggests there may be some support or uncertainty. In scientific or formal contexts, the strength of the rejection is important for clarity.