is split into

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'is split into' is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to refer to an object, concept, or idea that has been divided into multiple parts. For example, "The class is split into two groups for the field trip."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The app is split into two parts.

The New York Times - Tech

This course is split into 2 parts.

Yale University

Class time is split into two halves.

Stanford University

The performance is split into two parts.

Princeton University

The event is split into 2 parts.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The problem is split into two parts.

Journal of Computational Physics

The manuscript is split into sections.

The Guardian - Books

WorldCom is split into two groups.

The New York Times

Economics is split into two broad camps.

The Guardian - Business

The big group is split into two.

The Guardian - Sport

The hunt is split into two zones.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is split into", ensure the parts it's being divided into are clearly defined and relevant to the context.

Common error

Avoid using "splitted" as the past participle of "split". The correct form is "split". For example, say "The team is split into two groups" not "The team is splitted into two groups".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is split into" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something is being divided or separated into multiple parts or sections. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. Examples show it describing the division of classes, documents, and even geographical regions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

30%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is split into" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to describe the division of something into multiple parts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely accepted and employed across various contexts, including academic, news, and scientific writing. The analysis reveals that "is split into" functions primarily to describe structure and organization, offering clarity by breaking down complex entities. While alternatives like "is divided into" and "is separated into" exist, "is split into" maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse audiences. Remember to avoid the incorrect form "splitted" and ensure the parts are clearly defined for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is divided into

Uses the synonym "divided" instead of "split", implying a more formal or structured separation.

is separated into

Suggests a physical or conceptual separation into distinct parts.

is broken down into

Implies a more detailed or granular division into smaller components.

is categorized into

Focuses on the classification aspect of dividing items into groups.

is fragmented into

Suggests a division into smaller, often disconnected, pieces.

is apportioned into

Implies a distribution or allocation into different parts or recipients.

is segmented into

Highlights the division into distinct segments or sections.

is delineated into

Emphasizes a clear demarcation or boundary between the divided parts.

is partitioned into

Suggests a formal or structural division into separate areas or zones.

is composed of

Focuses on the constituent parts that make up the whole, rather than the act of division.

FAQs

How can I use "is split into" in a sentence?

You can use "is split into" to describe how something is divided. For example, "The presentation "is split into" three sections: introduction, body, and conclusion."

What are some alternatives to using "is split into"?

Alternatives include phrases like "is divided into", "is separated into", or "is broken down into", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "is splitted into"?

No, "splitted" is not the correct past participle of "split". The correct phrasing is ""is split into"".

What's the difference between "is split into" and "is composed of"?

"Is split into" implies a division of something into parts, whereas "is composed of" refers to the elements that make up the whole. For example, "The class is split into groups" vs. "The class is composed of students."