is robust for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is robust for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is strong, effective, or reliable in a particular context or for a specific purpose. Example: "The software is robust for handling large datasets without crashing."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Some parts of the industry are also much bubblier than others: demand in Europe is robust, for example.

The Economist

This method is robust for any lips shape.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Simulation results show that GA is robust for this problem.

Computer Communications

The proposed controller is robust for reference signals.

International Journal of Mineral Processing

It means that the proposed algorithm is robust for both channel fading and synchronization results.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Experiments on MSTAR public data demonstrate that the proposed HPSMCF is robust for variant recognition conditions.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

It is robust for an arbitrary degree of rotation, but limited in discrimination.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Wavelet-based edge detector is robust for blocking artifacts to reveal real edge.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

The present method is robust for a general smooth boundary contour.

Journal of Computational Physics

Then, we show that our approach is robust for various buffer sizes and workloads.

Data Science and Engineering

The adaptive backstepping sliding mode control system is robust for time-varying external disturbances.

Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is robust for", ensure that the context clearly defines the specific conditions or challenges that the subject is robust against. This provides clarity and strengthens the statement's impact.

Common error

Avoid stating that something "is robust for" everything without specifying the limitations. Overgeneralizing can weaken the claim and make it less credible. Instead, define the specific parameters or scenarios where robustness applies.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is robust for" functions as an adjective phrase followed by a preposition, modifying a noun or pronoun. As demonstrated by Ludwig, it indicates that something possesses strength and effectiveness in a specific context or under particular conditions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

7%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is robust for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, particularly within scientific and technical writing. Ludwig AI confirms that it denotes the strength and effectiveness of something under specific conditions. When employing this phrase, clarity is key; explicitly stating the circumstances for which the subject exhibits robustness enhances the statement's precision. While versatile, avoiding overgeneralization is crucial to maintain credibility. Consider alternatives like "is effective in" or "is reliable in" to fine-tune the conveyed meaning. The phrase commonly appears in scientific publications, demonstrating its formality and precision in academic contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is effective in

This alternative focuses on the effectiveness of something, rather than its strength or resilience.

is reliable in

This alternative emphasizes the dependability of something in a particular context.

is resilient under

This alternative highlights the ability to recover quickly from difficulties.

is well-suited to

This alternative indicates that something is appropriate or has the necessary qualities for a particular situation.

is resistant to

This alternative suggests an ability to withstand or oppose something negative.

is impervious to

This alternative highlights the inability to be affected by something.

can withstand

This alternative emphasizes the capability to endure adverse conditions or forces.

is capable of handling

This alternative focuses on the capacity to manage or deal with something effectively.

is designed to endure

This alternative highlights the intentional design for long-lasting performance.

is optimized for

This alternative suggests that something has been specifically improved to function effectively in a given situation.

FAQs

How can I use "is robust for" in a sentence?

Use "is robust for" to describe something that maintains its effectiveness or integrity even when facing specific challenges or variations. For example, "The algorithm "is robust for" noisy data."

What are some alternatives to "is robust for"?

Alternatives include "is effective in", "is reliable in", or "is resilient under depending on the nuance you wish to convey".

Which is correct, "is robust for" or "is robust against"?

While both can be used, "is robust for" is generally preferred when specifying the conditions or purpose for which something is robust. "Is robust against" is used to indicate resistance to specific threats or negative influences. The choice depends on the specific context.

How does "is robust for" differ from "is resistant to"?

"Is robust for" emphasizes overall effectiveness and stability under certain conditions, while "is resistant to" specifically highlights the ability to withstand or oppose particular forces or influences. Robustness implies a general resilience, whereas resistance implies a targeted defense.