is reviewed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is reviewed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something is being examined or evaluated in conjunction with someone or something else. Example: "The project proposal is reviewed with the stakeholders to ensure all concerns are addressed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Modelling of chemical reactors is reviewed with an emphasis on process development and scale-up.

Chemical Engineering Science

Basic principle of compressed sensing is reviewed, with emphasis on nonuniform sampling and signal reconstruction methods.

Measurement

Some knowledge on tactile warmth of wood is reviewed with these physical properties.

Energy

The recent literature on direct synthesis of H2O2 is reviewed with respect to two important directions.

Catalysis Today

Current instrumentation is reviewed with an emphasis on background reduction features and consequent limits of detection.

Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science

Current instrumentation is reviewed with emphasis on background reduction features and the consequent limits of detection.

Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science

Previous research on ammonia synthesis over ruthenium catalysts is reviewed with a particular emphasis on the action of alkali promoters.

Catalysis Today

The use of soluble polymeric ligands for homogeneous catalysts separation is reviewed with emphasis on work from the author's laboratory.

Catalysis Today

A general model of these systems is reviewed, with particular attention to the assumptions involved in the analysis.

Electrochimica Acta

The current status on mathematical modelling of semibatch and continuous PET reactors is reviewed with clear indication of existing gaps.

Chemical Engineering Science

The recent literature is reviewed with respect to the strength-limiting deformation mechanisms in nanocrystalline and ultrafine-grain metals.

Acta Materialia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is reviewed with", ensure that the additional element being considered alongside the primary subject is clearly stated and relevant to the context.

Common error

Avoid using "is reviewed with" to connect a subject with irrelevant or unrelated elements. Ensure that the elements being reviewed together have a logical connection and contribute to a meaningful analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is reviewed with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject is being examined or evaluated in conjunction with another element. Ludwig shows the phrase is used to connect a subject with a related aspect, factor, or perspective.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

News & Media

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is reviewed with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. According to Ludwig, it serves to indicate that a subject is being examined or evaluated in conjunction with another relevant element. While the phrase is considered correct, ensuring relevance between the subject and the additional element is crucial for effective communication. Several alternatives exist, such as "is examined alongside" or "is assessed in light of", offering subtle variations in meaning. Ludwig AI confirms the acceptability and usability of this phrase in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is examined alongside

Focuses on a parallel examination process.

is assessed in light of

Highlights that the assessment considers specific information or factors.

is considered along with

Similar to 'examined alongside' but emphasizes consideration.

is evaluated together with

Emphasizes a joint evaluation.

is analyzed in conjunction with

Suggests a more formal and detailed analysis.

is investigated with regard to

Implies a specific focus or purpose in the investigation.

is studied with respect to

Highlights the aspect or element to which the study relates.

is viewed in relation to

Focuses on how something is perceived based on its connection to something else.

is interpreted considering

Emphasizes a subjective understanding based on specific factors.

is understood within the framework of

Highlights the conceptual or theoretical context used for understanding.

FAQs

How can I use "is reviewed with" in a sentence?

Use "is reviewed with" to indicate that something is examined or evaluated in conjunction with something else. For example, "The project proposal "is reviewed with" the stakeholders to ensure all concerns are addressed."

What can I say instead of "is reviewed with"?

You can use alternatives like "is examined alongside", "is assessed in light of", or "is considered along with" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is reviewed with" or "is reviewed by"?

"Is reviewed with" indicates that something is reviewed in conjunction with another element, while "is reviewed by" indicates who is conducting the review. The choice depends on the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "is reviewed with" and "is analyzed with"?

"Is reviewed with" suggests a broad examination, while "is analyzed with" implies a more detailed and systematic assessment using specific methods or tools. The best choice depends on the depth and nature of the evaluation.