is reviewed for

USAGE SUMMARY

"is reviewed for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been evaluated, or is in the process of being evaluated. For example: "The financial records of the company are being reviewed for discrepancies."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

"Any information that is provided to our enforcement staff is reviewed for credibility," Howard said.

The New York Times - Sports

The data typically shown is reviewed for the period 31 December 2007 to 31 December 2016.

Harvard University

The reasonableness of the percentage awarded by the Court of Chancery is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.

Harvard University

Medical leave is granted by the Office of Graduate Education OGEE) and is reviewed for appropriateness by MIT Medical.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Each request is reviewed for approval signature by the Black Box Theatre Manager and the groups advisor.

Columbia University

The extant nomenclature for mitral valve disease is reviewed for the purpose of establishing a unified reporting system.

Stanford University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

The paper is being reviewed for publication.

The New York Times

SAT questions are reviewed for Eurocentrism, too.

The New York Times

The worksheet will be reviewed for approval.

University of California, Berkeley

Early stage trials are reviewed for safety.

Neurotherapeutics

Selected papers were reviewed for data extraction.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is reviewed for", ensure that the purpose of the review is clearly stated to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "is reviewed for" without specifying the criteria or purpose of the review. For example, instead of saying "The document is reviewed for quality", specify "The document is reviewed for grammatical accuracy and clarity".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is reviewed for" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject is undergoing evaluation or assessment in relation to a specific criterion or purpose. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the construction is grammatically sound and appropriate for use in a variety of contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Academia

32%

Science

41%

News & Media

27%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is reviewed for" is a grammatically correct and commonly used construction to denote that a subject is being evaluated for a specific attribute or purpose. According to Ludwig AI, its usage is appropriate across various contexts, most frequently in academic and scientific writing. When using "is reviewed for", clarity is key. You should specify the criteria for review to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "is evaluated regarding" may offer a more nuanced way to express the same general idea. This expression offers significant utility in formal and neutral registers.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is evaluated regarding

Focuses on the specific aspects or criteria used in the evaluation process.

is assessed with respect to

Highlights the comparison against a particular standard or benchmark.

is examined in terms of

Implies a detailed and thorough investigation of particular aspects.

is checked considering

Suggests a verification process taking specific factors into account.

is audited focusing on

Emphasizes a formal inspection, typically for compliance or accuracy.

is inspected concerning

Highlights a careful visual examination related to a specific subject.

is screened with reference to

Indicates a preliminary assessment to filter out unsuitable items.

is investigated regarding

Suggests a deeper, more formal inquiry into potential issues.

is analyzed concerning

Implies a detailed study to understand the components and their relationships.

is scrutinized focusing on

Emphasizes a very careful and critical examination.

FAQs

How can I use "is reviewed for" in a sentence?

You can use "is reviewed for" to indicate that something is being examined or assessed for a specific purpose or quality. For example, "The application "is reviewed for completeness" and accuracy".

What are some alternatives to "is reviewed for"?

Some alternatives include "is evaluated regarding", "is assessed with respect to", or "is examined in terms of", each conveying slightly different nuances of assessment.

Is it correct to say "is being reviewed for" instead of "is reviewed for"?

Yes, "is being reviewed for" emphasizes the ongoing nature of the review process, while "is reviewed for" can imply a more general or completed review. Both are grammatically correct and depend on the intended emphasis.

What's the difference between "is reviewed for" and "is checked for"?

"is reviewed for" suggests a more thorough and formal assessment, while "is checked for" implies a simpler, more basic verification process.