is reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something is being examined or evaluated, often in formal or academic settings. Example: "The document is reviewed by the committee before any decisions are made."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Each question is reviewed twice by two different reviewers.

TechCrunch

prospectus, which is reviewed by the S.E.C.

The New York Times

The program is reviewed at length.

The New Yorker

The play is reviewed and it stands.

The Guardian - Sport

What resource is reviewed in "Mapping Cyberspace"?

The New York Times

The performance of game officials is reviewed after every game.

The New York Times - Sports

A Better Life is reviewed on page 15.

The Guardian - Film

"Every complaint received by the department is reviewed and investigated".

The New York Times

Every one of those reports is reviewed, Dr. Qi insisted.

The New York Times

"The case is reviewed at every step of the way".

The New York Times

The number of districts is reviewed every 10 years.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is reviewed", ensure the context clearly indicates who is conducting the review and what criteria are being used. Clarity enhances the sentence's informative value.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by specifying who or what performs the review. Instead of just stating something "is reviewed", clarify who reviews it to maintain clarity and avoid vagueness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is reviewed" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject is undergoing examination or evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts. For instance, "Each question is reviewed twice by two different reviewers".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

19%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is reviewed" is a commonly used passive construction indicating that something is undergoing examination or evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms its correct grammatical usage and prevalence in diverse contexts, particularly within scientific, news, and formal business domains. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the entity conducting the review. Alternatives like ""is examined"", ""is assessed"", and ""is evaluated"" offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances. Remember that the proper tense (present vs. past) should accurately reflect when the review takes place.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is examined

Replaces "reviewed" with a synonym focusing on detailed inspection.

is assessed

Substitutes "reviewed" with a word that highlights evaluation and judgment.

is evaluated

Changes "reviewed" to emphasize the process of determining value or significance.

is inspected

Alters "reviewed" to indicate a careful and formal examination.

is audited

Replaces "reviewed" with a term suggesting a systematic check for accuracy and compliance.

is checked

A more general synonym for "reviewed", indicating a verification process.

is scrutinized

Substitutes "reviewed" to suggest a thorough and critical examination.

is investigated

Changes "reviewed" to imply a detailed inquiry or investigation.

is considered

Replaces "reviewed" with a phrase that highlights thoughtful attention and deliberation.

is analyzed

Alters "reviewed" to emphasize a detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

FAQs

How can I use "is reviewed" in a sentence?

You can use "is reviewed" to indicate that something is being examined or evaluated. For example, "The manuscript "is reviewed" by experts before publication".

What are some alternatives to saying "is reviewed"?

Alternatives include "is examined", "is assessed", or "is evaluated", depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "is reviewed" or "was reviewed"?

"Is reviewed" is present tense, used for ongoing or habitual actions, while "was reviewed" is past tense, used for actions completed in the past. Choose the tense that accurately reflects when the review occurred.

What's the difference between "is reviewed" and "is under review"?

"Is reviewed" suggests the review process is a standard procedure or has already occurred. "Is under review" implies the review is currently in progress.