is recognized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is recognized with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to convey that someone is being honored or awarded something. Example: "She is recognized with the prestigious award for her contributions to science."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

On the streets, he is recognized with increasing frequency, and is often greeted with pats on the back, thumbs-up signs, honks from car horns or shouts of encouragement.

The New York Times

Nobody in the game should be honored for wearing a backward cap on the field until Max Patkin is recognized with a plaque for doing it for fifty-one years as "The Clown Prince of Baseball".

The New Yorker

In addition, the nanostructured materials preferentially adsorb vitronectin, which is recognized with osteoblasts through the KRSR amino acid sequence.

Nanobiomaterials in Hard Tissue Engineering Applications of Nanobiomaterials Volume 4

For occluded mouth images, sadness is recognized with the lowest accuracy (71.86%) since sadness is highly confused to disgust and surprise.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

As a result, significant processing flexibility with the LMDS system over conventional processing capabilities is recognized, with potentially lower production cost, higher quality components, and shorter lead-time.

Optics & Laser Technology

These data also strongly suggest that the intercalation state of TMPyP is more stable than its adsorption state in grooves when it is recognized with DNA.

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

His contributions were recognized with numerous awards.

The New York Times

The Times is proud to be recognized with the magazine industry's greatest honor.

The New Yorker

Mrs. Callner Miller's dedication was recognized with an honorary fellowship from the Technion in 1984.

The New York Times

At the agency's annual meeting several months ago, Andy was recognized with the Founder's Award.

The New York Times

Her work was recognized with photography awards and a 1955 George Polk Award, among others.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing recognition or awards, use stronger verbs like "awarded", "honored", or "recognized for" instead of "is recognized with".

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "recognized" when referring to awards or qualities. Instead, use "for" or rephrase to use verbs like "awarded" or "honored". For instance, instead of "She is recognized with an award", say "She was awarded an award" or "She is recognized for her contributions".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is recognized with" functions as a passive construction aiming to denote acknowledgment or association. However, according to Ludwig AI, it's not considered standard English and is often misused, particularly when trying to convey an honor or award. Proper usage dictates alternatives like "awarded" or "honored with".

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

35%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "is recognized with" appears in various sources, including news and scientific contexts as shown by Ludwig, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI suggests that it is better to use alternatives like "is awarded" or "is honored with" when referring to honors or achievements. The prevalence of this phrase, despite its questionable correctness, underscores the importance of considering both frequency and grammatical accuracy when writing. It's often better to rephrase using stronger verbs or prepositions like "for" to ensure clarity and correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is associated with

This alternative conveys a connection or link without specifying the nature of the relationship.

is regarded as

This alternative reflects a subjective evaluation or opinion.

is acknowledged by

This alternative shifts the focus to acknowledgement rather than direct association.

is honored by

This alternative focuses on the act of receiving an honor or award.

is credited with

This alternative emphasizes the attribution of a particular quality or achievement.

is distinguished by

This alternative emphasizes a unique or notable feature.

is known for

This alternative suggests a general reputation or widespread perception.

is identified by

This alternative highlights a specific characteristic that defines the subject.

is synonymous with

This alternative indicates that two things are closely equivalent in meaning or implication.

is defined as

This alternative specifies a precise definition or explanation.

FAQs

How can I properly use the word "recognized" in a sentence about an award?

Instead of saying "is recognized with", consider using "is awarded" or "is honored with". For example, "She "is honored with" the prize" or "She is recognized for her contributions".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "is recognized with"?

You can use phrases like "is known for", "is credited with", or "is associated with" depending on the context. For instance, "He "is known for" his research".

Is there a difference between "is recognized with" and "is recognized for"?

Yes, "is recognized for" is the more grammatically correct and widely accepted phrase. It accurately indicates the reason or achievement for which someone is being recognized. "Is recognized with" is generally considered incorrect. So avoid saying "She "is recognized with" her award".

What's a better way to phrase a sentence using "recognized" to show someone received an honor?

Opt for "was awarded", "was honored", or "was given". For example, "The scientist "was awarded" the Nobel Prize" is much clearer than "The scientist is recognized with the Nobel Prize".