is reason for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is reason for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express causation or justification, but it requires additional context or restructuring to be clear. Example: "The delay is reason for concern." should be rephrased to "The delay is a reason for concern."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That is reason for celebration.

The Economist

There is reason for that.

The New York Times - Sports

There is reason for worry.

The New York Times

There is reason for optimism.

The New York Times

There is reason for excitement in Toronto.

The New York Times - Sports

"That is reason for some concern".

The New York Times

Today, however, there is reason for optimism.

The New York Times

But there is reason for skepticism.

The New York Times - Books

But there is reason for some skepticism.

The New York Times

And that alone is reason for hope.

The Economist

Some think there is reason for hope.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider more precise alternatives like "cause", "justification", or "grounds" for greater clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid omitting the article "a" before "reason". Saying "is reason for" is grammatically incorrect. Always include the article for proper grammar: "is a reason for".

Linguistic Context

The phrase, while grammatically questionable according to Ludwig AI, functions primarily as a causal connector, linking a preceding situation to a subsequent feeling, action, or state. Its usage intends to highlight a justification or cause.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "is reason for" appears frequently in various contexts, it's grammatically incorrect without the article "a". According to Ludwig AI, using "is a reason for" corrects this issue and provides grammatical accuracy. The prevalence of this phrase indicates its common intent to express causation or justification, particularly in news, academic, and business contexts. However, writers should strive for precision by using alternative phrases such as "is cause for" or "is justification for" where appropriate. Remember to always include the article or choose a synonymous phrase to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is a reason for

Adds the article "a", correcting the grammar and indicating a specific instance.

is cause for

Replaces "reason" with "cause", emphasizing direct causation.

is justification for

Substitutes "reason" with "justification", highlighting the act of providing reasons.

is grounds for

Replaces "reason" with "grounds", indicating a basis or foundation.

is the rationale for

Replaces "reason" with "rationale", suggesting a logical explanation.

accounts for

Uses a verb phrase that explains the cause or explanation of something.

explains why

Changes the structure to directly state that something explains a subsequent event.

is attributed to

Shifts the focus to assigning a cause or origin.

stems from

Indicates that something originates or arises from a specific cause.

is born of

Indicates that something comes into existence as a result of something else.

FAQs

How to use "is reason for" correctly in a sentence?

The phrase "is reason for" is grammatically incorrect without the article "a". The correct form is "is a reason for". For example: "This success is "is a reason for" celebration".

What can I say instead of "is reason for"?

You can use alternatives like "is cause for", "is justification for", or "is grounds for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is reason for" or "is a reason for"?

"Is a reason for" is the grammatically correct option. The phrase "is reason for" omits the necessary article "a".

What's the difference between "is reason for" and "is the reason for"?

"Is reason for" is grammatically incorrect. "Is the reason for" implies there's a specific, already-understood reason. For example, "The budget cuts "is the reason for" the project's delay" indicates a known, specific reason.