is prominent enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is prominent enough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the visibility or significance of something in a particular context. Example: "The logo is prominent enough to catch the attention of potential customers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

"I get nothing but open-arm receptions," said Mr. Hofman, who is prominent enough in the music world that Kanye West links to him on Twitter.

The New York Times

The network is prominent enough to have its own international identifier recognized by air-traffic controllers, who often give their flights priority.

The New York Times

But as a trend, modern Hungarian is prominent enough now to extend up and down the dining hierarchy, from Michelin-starred rooms to neighborhood cafes — all while keeping that most old-fashioned of values: hospitality.

The New York Times - Travel

It proceeds as a series of interconnected shards, with stretches of orchestral fabric revolving around a piano line that is prominent enough to be generally seen as the musical evocation of Prometheus, but not so prominent as to make the piece into a concerto.

The New York Times - Arts

Earthlink, though, is prominent enough to have deals with cable companies like AT&T Broadband, which has since been merged with Comcast.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Sometimes, guests at the Beverly Wilshire are prominent enough that their images are easily accessible on the Internet.

The New York Times

Others are maverick members of Congress or agency heads, who are not in a position to set policy but are prominent enough to get noticed.

The New York Times

Twenty years later, according to Tacitus, Christians in Rome were prominent enough to be persecuted by Nero, and it was known that they were devoted to Christus, whom Pilate had executed (Annals 15.44).

Encyclopedia Britannica

"You want to be prominent enough without overpowering the screen and to make it as small as possible without being obtrusive," said Sean McManus, the president of CBS Sports, which is carrying the Super Bowl on Sunday.

The New York Times - Sports

One more difference from the 2008 campaign is that the Romney brothers now have a rival of sorts: the Huntsman girls and their playful, flirty Twitter feed, which has been prominent enough to spark profiles in The New York Times, The New Yorker and GQ.

The New York Times

Karra J. Porter, a lawyer in Salt Lake City who represents I Works, Mr. Johnson's wife and parents, and 24 other companies named as defendants in the case (though not Mr. Johnson), said the disclosures were prominent enough that, out of some 10 million membership enrollments, I Works' customers canceled about three million during the free trial period.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is prominent enough" to describe something that stands out sufficiently to be noticed or have an effect. It implies a balance between being visible and not being overwhelming.

Common error

Avoid using "is prominent enough" when something is actually highly dominant or overwhelming. This phrase is best suited for situations where prominence is adequate but not excessive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is prominent enough" serves as an evaluative adjective phrase, indicating that something possesses a sufficient degree of visibility or importance. As Ludwig AI explains, it implies adequacy without being overwhelming. Examples show usage in describing brand visibility and significance of individuals.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is prominent enough" is a grammatically correct and usable expression that suggests something has reached a sufficient level of visibility or significance without being overwhelming. Ludwig AI indicates that it is commonly used in News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias. While the phrase isn't overly formal, it's often employed when a neutral assessment is needed, such as determining whether a brand's logo is visible enough or if an individual's influence is sufficiently recognized. Alternatives include "is sufficiently visible" or "is adequately noticeable". It is important to consider not overstating something by saying "is prominent enough" when something is actually highly dominant or overwhelming.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is sufficiently visible

Focuses on visual aspect of being noticed, rather than overall significance.

is adequately noticeable

Highlights the aspect of being noticed to a satisfactory degree.

is conspicuously evident

Emphasizes that something is very easy to notice.

is remarkably significant

Shifts focus to the importance or impact of something.

is decidedly important

Highlights the quality of being undeniably important.

is notably remarkable

Emphasizes that something is worth paying attention to because it's noteworthy.

is particularly striking

Stresses the characteristic of being visually impressive or attention-grabbing.

is meaningfully apparent

Highlights the feature of being clear or obvious with some purpose.

is largely recognizable

Emphasizes the aspect of being easily identified.

is broadly acknowledged

Shifts the meaning to widespread recognition or acceptance.

FAQs

How can I use "is prominent enough" in a sentence?

You can use "is prominent enough" to indicate that something is sufficiently noticeable or important without being overwhelming. For example, "The logo "is prominent enough" to catch the eye but doesn't distract from the main content."

What are some alternatives to "is prominent enough"?

Alternatives include "is sufficiently visible", "is adequately noticeable", or "is conspicuously evident", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When should I use "is prominent enough" instead of "is very prominent"?

"Is prominent enough" suggests a sufficient level of visibility or importance, whereas "is very prominent" indicates a high degree of prominence. Use "is prominent enough" when you want to emphasize adequacy rather than a superlative degree of prominence.

Which is correct, "is prominent enough to be seen" or "is prominent enough to see"?

"Is prominent enough to be seen" is grammatically correct. The passive voice emphasizes that the prominence allows something to be observed. "Is prominent enough to see" is less common and might imply that the prominence enables someone to see something else.