is practical to validate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is practical to validate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the feasibility or reasonableness of validating something, such as a process, method, or data. Example: "In our research, we found that it is practical to validate the results through multiple testing methods."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

We use HP lattice model examples (for which exhaustive enumeration of sequences is practical) to validate our ranking approach in obtaining sequences of lowest energy for any H P residue composition for a given native-state structure.

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

that will not be practical to test.

Forbes

Finally, a numerical experiment that can reflect the practical situations is performed to validate the applicability of the developed model and solution algorithm.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Although the use of paper cases have been criticised [ 21], the method is practical and has been validated [ 22, 23].

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Furthermore, a case-study is presented to validate the practical implementation of the proposed concept.

Future Generation Computer Systems

The medium voltage electricity consumption data of a practical distribution system is used to validate the effectiveness of proposed control scheme.

Journal of Energy Storage

The Score is used to reflect the patient's performance or function and ability to work, and is practical, objective, and has been validated and used for the past 50 years [ 46].

BMC Cancer

Further research is needed to validate discriminative performance and practical implications of the CCQ in detecting exacerbations in daily care.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Both numerical simulation and practical experiment are conducted to validate the proposed methodology.

International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

Finally, the simulation results for the theoretical and practical examples are given to validate the proposed controller.

ISA Transactions

Finally, the comparative mathematical simulations and the practical experiments are used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

ISA Transactions

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is practical to validate", ensure that you follow it with a clear explanation of why the validation is considered practical in the given context. This adds clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "is practical to validate" as a generic statement. Always provide specific reasons or examples to support your claim that the validation is indeed practical. Saying something is practical without justification weakens your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is practical to validate" functions as an evaluative statement, assessing the feasibility and reasonability of validating a method, process, or result. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

17%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is practical to validate" is a grammatically correct but infrequent expression used to assess the feasibility and reasonability of validating a process or method. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, it aims to assert the practicality of validation based on efficiency and resource availability. While alternatives like "is feasible to verify" or "is reasonable to confirm" offer subtle variations, ensuring specific justifications when claiming practicality is crucial for persuasive communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is feasible to validate

Replaces "practical" with "feasible", suggesting possibility rather than convenience.

is reasonable to validate

Substitutes "practical" with "reasonable", indicating justification and rationale.

is viable to validate

Uses "viable" instead of "practical", emphasizing the potential for success.

is realistic to validate

Replaces "practical" with "realistic", highlighting the grounded nature of the validation.

is pragmatic to validate

Swaps "practical" for "pragmatic", stressing the usefulness of the validation in achieving a specific goal.

is worthwhile to validate

Emphasizes the value of validation by using "worthwhile"

is sensible to validate

Highlights the rationality of validation.

is advantageous to validate

Focuses on the benefits of validating.

can realistically be validated

Rephrases to emphasize the possibility of validation under real-world conditions.

lends itself to practical validation

Shifts the focus to the inherent suitability for validation.

FAQs

How can I use "is practical to validate" in a sentence?

You can use "is practical to validate" when discussing the feasibility or reasonableness of verifying something. For example: "In our research, we found that "it is practical to validate" the results through multiple testing methods."

What can I say instead of "is practical to validate"?

You can use alternatives like "is feasible to verify", "is reasonable to confirm", or "is viable to validate" depending on the context.

What makes a method "practical" to validate?

A validation method is considered "practical" when it's cost-effective, time-efficient, and can be implemented with available resources and expertise.

Is there a difference between "is practical to validate" and "is easy to validate"?

Yes, while both describe aspects of feasibility, "is practical to validate" implies that the method is sensible and efficient, whereas "is easy to validate" suggests the method requires minimal effort or complexity, but may not always be the best approach.