Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
is noted in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "is noted in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been recorded or mentioned in a specific source or document. Example: "The findings of the research are noted in the final report submitted to the committee."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
This is noted in our published entry requirements, where appropriate.
News & Media
"The actual date is noted in the index.
News & Media
The latest date to order for Dec. 24 delivery is noted in parentheses.
News & Media
Although six blacks were on board, only one shipmate is noted in the battle report.
News & Media
The escape of Peter from his chains is noted in the feast of August 1.
Encyclopedias
Oral contrast is noted in bowel loops.
Science
The NG tube is noted in situ.
Science
Some asymmetry is noted in the strong multiple contact limit.
Science
Vicarious excretion of CM is noted in the colon.
Science
Subdentritic type of drainage pattern is noted in this region.
Science
The same result is noted in Ramachandra et al. [1].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "is noted in", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being referenced and where it can be found. Include specific details such as the title, author, or page number to enhance clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "is noted in" without providing sufficient context or citation details. Without a clear reference, the statement loses its credibility and is difficult to verify.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "is noted in" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that a particular piece of information has been recorded or observed within a specific source. As Ludwig AI shows, this is commonly used across different contexts to provide credibility and direct readers to the reference.
Frequent in
Science
51%
News & Media
25%
Wiki
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
6%
Encyclopedias
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "is noted in" functions as a passive construction used to cite information from a specific source. According to Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and frequently used across various domains, including science, news, and academic writing. While alternatives like "is mentioned in" or "is recorded in" exist, "is noted in" is a reliable way to provide credibility and direct readers to the referenced material. When using this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient context and specific details to enhance clarity and credibility.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
is mentioned in
This alternative directly replaces "noted" with "mentioned", keeping the passive voice and indicating that something is referred to in a source. The difference is mostly stylistic.
is recorded in
This alternative replaces "noted" with "recorded", suggesting a more formal or official documentation. The nuance is a stronger emphasis on the documentation aspect.
is found in
This suggests that something can be located within a specific source or document. It highlights the presence of information rather than the act of noting it.
is documented in
Similar to "is recorded in", but emphasizes the process of documenting information systematically. Suggests a higher degree of detail and formality.
is detailed in
This indicates that something is explained or described with thoroughness in a particular source, emphasizing depth of information.
is specified in
Implies that particular details or requirements are explicitly stated within a document or source, pointing to a level of precision.
is outlined in
Suggests that the source provides a summary or structured overview of something. It's used when presenting a plan or framework.
is indicated in
This suggests that a particular point or piece of information is hinted at or suggested by the source, often without being explicitly stated.
appears in
This is a more general alternative, simply stating that something is present in a source without specifying the nature of its presence.
is reflected in
This suggests that something is mirrored or shown indirectly in the source, often implying a connection or influence rather than direct mention.
FAQs
How can I use "is noted in" in a sentence?
Use "is noted in" to indicate that something has been recorded or observed in a specific source. For example, "The increase in temperature "is noted in" the research report."
What are some alternatives to "is noted in"?
You can use alternatives such as "is mentioned in", "is recorded in", or "is documented in", depending on the context and the nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use "is noted in" or "is mentioned in"?
The choice between "is noted in" and "is mentioned in" depends on the context. "Is noted in" implies a more formal recording or observation, while "is mentioned in" simply indicates that something is referred to.
What's the difference between "is noted in" and "is indicated in"?
"Is noted in" suggests that something has been explicitly recorded or observed in a source. In contrast, "is indicated in" implies that something is suggested or hinted at, but not explicitly stated.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested