is not true of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not true of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a particular statement or characteristic does not apply to a specific subject or situation. Example: "The assumption that all teenagers are irresponsible is not true of my son, who is very mature for his age."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

That is not true of carmakers.

The Economist

The same is not true of despotism.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Sadly, this is not true of Zeugma.

The Economist

This is not true of 3D printing.

The Economist

But this is not true of Ikea.

The New York Times - Arts

The same is not true of grass.

The New York Times

This is not true of Porsche.

The New Yorker

That is not true of Helen Mirren.

The New Yorker

The same is not true of attitudes towards women.

The Guardian - Opinion

That is not true of any Democrat today.

The New York Times

The same is not true of Mary's backstory.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is not true of" to clearly and directly negate a statement or characteristic in relation to a specific subject. This phrasing is effective for highlighting exceptions or differences.

Common error

Avoid using "is not true of" when a statement is simply a matter of opinion or perspective. This phrase works best when addressing objective inaccuracies or exceptions to established facts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not true of" serves as a negative assertion, used to deny the validity or applicability of a statement in relation to a specific subject or context. Ludwig confirms that it's grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is not true of" is a versatile and grammatically sound way to express that a statement or characteristic does not apply to a specific case. Ludwig confirms its validity and frequent use across diverse contexts. While it's most common in news and media, it also appears in scientific and academic writing. Remember to use this phrase to highlight exceptions or correct misunderstandings, and be mindful of overgeneralizations. Alternatives like "does not apply to" or "is not the case for" can provide similar meanings with slight variations in formality and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not apply to

Replaces "is not true of" with a more direct expression of non-applicability.

is not the case for

Indicates that a certain situation or statement is not valid for a specific subject.

does not hold for

Suggests that a rule or generalization is not applicable in a particular instance.

is not valid for

Implies that something is not accurate or legitimate in relation to a specific case.

is inapplicable to

A more formal way of saying that something cannot be applied to a specific situation.

doesn't stand for

This option indicates that something is contrary to what something else may stand for.

is untrue regarding

Indicates that a statement is false or inaccurate with respect to a particular subject.

is inaccurate for

Suggests that the information is not correct or precise in relation to a specific case.

fails to apply to

Emphasizes that something is unable to be used or relevant in a particular context.

is an exception to

Highlights that something is an unusual case that does not follow the general rule.

FAQs

How can I use "is not true of" in a sentence?

Use "is not true of" to indicate that a statement or generalization does not apply to a specific subject or situation. For example, "While that may be the case for some, it "is not true of" everyone".

What are some alternatives to "is not true of"?

Alternatives include phrases like "does not apply to", "is not the case for", or "is inapplicable to", depending on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is it better to say "is not true of" or "does not apply to"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and can often be used interchangeably. "Is not true of" might be preferred for directly negating a statement, while "does not apply to" may be better suited for indicating that a rule or generalization doesn't fit a specific case.

What's the difference between "is not true of" and "is false for"?

"Is not true of" indicates that a statement doesn't hold for a specific instance, whereas "is false for" suggests the statement is incorrect in relation to something. The nuance lies in whether you're highlighting an exception versus disputing the statement's accuracy overall.