is not true for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not true for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a particular statement or condition does not apply to a specific case or situation. Example: "While this theory works in many instances, it is not true for all scenarios."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

That is not true for methanol.

The Economist

The same is not true for Cavallini.

The New York Times - Arts

That is not true for the Palestinians.

The New York Times

But, that is not true for everyone.

The New York Times

But that is not true for all companies.

The New York Times

The same is not true for the Church.

The Economist

That is not true for average working families.

The New York Times

It is not true for the large, regressive middle class.

The New York Times

The same is not true for, say, a mammographer.

The New York Times - Magazine

Mereological essentialism is not true for them.

SEP

That is not true for Hu.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is not true for", ensure clarity by explicitly stating what the statement is true for, to provide a contrasting comparison.

Common error

Avoid using "is not true for" when a statement simply requires qualification or nuance. Ensure that the exception you're highlighting truly invalidates the original claim, rather than just requiring a more specific interpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not true for" functions as a negating qualifier, indicating that a statement or condition does not apply to a specific noun or situation. It is frequently used to introduce exceptions or limitations to a general rule or observation. As Ludwig AI highlights, the expression is deemed correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

46%

News & Media

43%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not true for" is a versatile expression used to indicate that a general statement does not apply in a specific situation. It is deemed grammatically correct by Ludwig AI and is commonly found in both formal and informal contexts, especially in science and news media. The phrase serves to introduce exceptions or limitations, ensuring clarity and precision. When using this phrase, it’s helpful to provide a contrasting comparison to what the statement is true for. Remember to avoid overgeneralization and ensure the exception truly invalidates the original claim.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not apply to

Focuses on the inapplicability of something to a specific situation.

is not applicable to

Emphasizes that something is not relevant or appropriate in a given context.

does not hold for

Indicates that a rule, condition, or statement is invalid in a particular instance.

is invalid for

Highlights the incorrectness or lack of validity in a specific situation.

is not the case for

Suggests that a certain situation or circumstance is not factual for a specific subject.

fails to apply to

Emphasizes that a rule or principle cannot be used or implemented in a particular case.

is an exception to

Highlights that something deviates from a general rule or pattern.

is untrue regarding

Focuses on the falsity of a statement about something specific.

doesn't stand for

Indicates that something does not represent or apply to a particular thing.

is outside the scope of

Suggests that a topic or condition falls beyond the limits of something.

FAQs

How to use "is not true for" in a sentence?

Use "is not true for" to indicate that a statement or condition doesn't apply to a specific case. For example, "While this might be the general trend, it "is not true for" all individuals."

What can I say instead of "is not true for"?

You can use alternatives such as "does not apply to", "is not applicable to", or "does not hold for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is not true for" or "is not true of"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct but have slightly different meanings. "Is not true for" indicates that something is not valid in the case of a specific subject, while "is not true of" suggests that something doesn't accurately describe the subject.

What's the difference between "is not true for" and "does not apply to"?

"Is not true for" implies a statement is factually incorrect in a specific case. "Does not apply to" suggests that a rule, principle, or method is unsuitable or irrelevant for a particular situation. The first talks about facts, the second about relevance.