is not the same for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not the same for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that two or more things differ in a specific context or situation. Example: "The level of support provided by the organization is not the same for all employees."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But this protective effect is not the same for everyone, probably because of genetic differences.

BBC

Grief is not the same for everyone.

The New York Times

It is not the same for him.

The New York Times - Magazine

It is not the same for Venus and Serena.

The New York Times - Sports

It is not the same for men at all".

The Guardian - Books

But it is not the same for most humans.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

It is not the same for the other teams.

Independent

But even the Old Testament itself is not the same for Jews and Christians.

The New York Times

But the situation is not the same for male murder victims.

The New York Times

"Since 9/11, it is not the same for me," he said.

The New York Times

But determining the monthly payment for the space, he said, is not the same for both.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "is not the same for", ensure that the comparison is clear and that the context provides sufficient information to understand the differences being highlighted.

Common error

Avoid using "is not the same for" without explicitly stating what the difference refers to. Always provide a clear point of reference to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not the same for" functions as a comparative expression, indicating that a particular condition, outcome, or experience varies depending on the subject. It's used to highlight differences, as shown in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

38%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is not the same for" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression to convey that something varies across different subjects or contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use. Predominantly found in news and media and scientific publications, it serves to highlight a lack of uniformity, encouraging precision in identifying the source of variations. To ensure clarity, make the comparison explicit. While versatile, maintain contextual awareness for the subtle difference between variations and straightforward distinctions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

differs depending on

Emphasizes the dependency of the outcome on a specific factor.

varies among

Highlights the variation between different entities or groups.

is distinct for

Focuses on the unique characteristics of something in relation to others.

is unlike for

Directly states the dissimilarity in a particular situation.

is not uniform across

Highlights the lack of consistency across a range of items or cases.

is inconsistent with

Highlights that something is not constant.

does not apply equally to

Indicates that something has different effects on or relevance to different entities.

is not analogous for

Emphasizes the dissimilarity in the comparison of two analogous situations.

is differentiated for

Focuses on the reasons that explain the differences.

presents differently for

Highlights the differences in presentation or manifestation.

FAQs

How can I use "is not the same for" in a sentence?

Use "is not the same for" to highlight differences between groups, situations, or individuals. For instance, "The support provided "is not the same for" all employees."

What are some alternatives to saying "is not the same for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "differs depending on", "varies among", or "is distinct for", which offer similar meanings with slightly different emphasis.

Is it grammatically correct to say "is not the same for"?

Yes, the phrase "is not the same for" is grammatically correct and widely used in English to indicate that something differs based on the subject or context.

What's the difference between "is not the same for" and "is different from"?

"Is not the same for" emphasizes that something varies depending on who or what is being considered, while "is different from" simply highlights a distinction between two things. For example: "The process "is not the same for" all individuals" versus "This method "is different from" that one."