is not preferential

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not preferential" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something does not favor one option over another or is neutral in its approach. Example: "The policy is not preferential, ensuring that all applicants are treated equally regardless of their background."

✓ Grammatically correct

Encyclopedias

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

By contrast, commanded love is not spontaneous, and it needs to be commanded precisely because it is not preferential.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It also contains dummy (RTA) indicating whether the trade relationship is or is not preferential and dummy (Currency) indicating the existence of a common currency.

Journal of Shipping and Trade

Poorly responsive patients are likely to have a GH-secreting adenoma with a somatostatin receptor profile that is not preferential to Lan or octreotide, which bind to type 2 and 5 receptors.

Clinical Endocrinology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

But Ms. Richman said this was not preferential treatment because her client had no incentive to have the case drag on.

The New York Times

Under United States bankruptcy law, Mr. Giddens must verify whether MF Global's eve-of-bankruptcy payouts to the companies were in the "ordinary course of business" and were not "preferential".

The New York Times

"We are seeking information about a limited number of payments to make sure that the payments were not preferential or accelerated, which would render them subject to return to the MF Global Inc. estate under the Bankruptcy Code".

The New York Times

The governing body was aware that some of the Crusaders players were in the country on working-holiday visas, but this was not preferential treatment as several other clubs in the National Leagues exploited confusion over the regulations to field overseas players on a similar basis, until the loophole was closed by the Border Agency last autumn.

The Guardian - Sport

The current circumstances in Greenland are not preferential.

Journal of Organization Design

The available free volume in the amorphous materials is considered to be essential for supplying interstitial-like space as diffusion paths for additional Li-ions, because lattice site changes, as usual for diffusion in the crystalline state, are not preferential in the amorphous state.

Electrochimica Acta

(i.e., there was not preferential assignment to one arm owing to a lack of a superior 4-month PFS observed for one arm).

British Journal of Cancer

We cannot, therefore, confirm that all invasive H. influenzae isolates from the early years of surveillance were sent to AIP, or that there was not preferential selection of Hib strains for surveillance.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is not preferential", ensure the context clearly establishes what the lack of preference pertains to. This helps avoid ambiguity and strengthens the statement's impact.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "is not preferential" automatically implies complete neutrality. While it signifies a lack of favoritism, it doesn't necessarily mean the situation is entirely unbiased, as other factors might still influence outcomes.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not preferential" functions as a descriptive phrase indicating the absence of favoritism or bias. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English, showing it describes policies, treatments, or selections that treat all parties equally.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not preferential" serves to indicate the absence of favoritism or bias, ensuring fairness and equality. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and appropriate for use in formal contexts. While the phrase appears less frequently, when employed, it typically aims to convey objectivity, as found across News & Media, Encyclopedia and Scientific sources. Understanding its semantic alternatives, like "is unbiased" or "is equitable", enhances precision in expressing intended nuances. Ultimately, effective use hinges on providing clear context and avoiding assumptions of inherent neutrality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is unbiased

Focuses on the absence of prejudice or leaning towards one side.

is impartial

Emphasizes fairness and objectivity in judgment or treatment.

is non-discriminatory

Highlights the absence of discrimination based on specific characteristics.

is equitable

Stresses fairness and justice in the distribution of resources or opportunities.

is neutral

Indicates a lack of involvement or support for either side.

is objective

Emphasizes a focus on facts and evidence rather than personal feelings or opinions.

is without favoritism

Directly states the absence of preferential treatment.

does not discriminate

Highlights the active avoidance of discriminatory practices.

is even-handed

Suggests a balanced and fair approach in dealing with different parties.

treats all equally

Focuses on the equal treatment of all individuals or groups.

FAQs

How can I use "is not preferential" in a sentence?

You can use "is not preferential" to describe a system, policy, or treatment that does not favor one party over another. For example, "The selection process "is not preferential", ensuring all candidates are evaluated fairly."

What's the difference between "is not preferential" and "is unbiased"?

"Is not preferential" specifically means there's no favoritism, while "is unbiased" implies a complete absence of prejudice or preconceived notions. The former focuses on equal treatment, the latter on objective judgment.

What can I say instead of "is not preferential"?

You can use alternatives like "is impartial", "is equitable", or "is neutral" depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it always positive to say something "is not preferential"?

While generally positive, suggesting fairness and equality, whether something ""is not preferential"" is good or bad depends on the context. Sometimes, specific considerations may warrant differentiated treatment, and claiming a lack of preference might be inappropriate.