is not injured

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not injured" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone or something has not sustained any injuries, often in contexts related to health, safety, or sports. Example: "After the accident, the driver was relieved to find that he is not injured."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

49 human-written examples

"He is not injured.

Independent

Dwyer is not injured.

The New York Times - Sports

Jared Sullinger insists he is not injured.

The New York Times

We saw today he is not injured.

The New York Times - Sports

Sometimes part of a leaf blade is not injured due to stomates being closed.

Cornell University

"First of all Jack is not injured, that was not the right information," Wenger told Arsenal.com.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

10 human-written examples

He was not injured.

The New York Times

Mathias Kiwanuka was not injured.

The New York Times - Sports

The musicians were not injured.

The New York Times

His parents were not injured.

The New York Times

The victim was not injured.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is not injured" to clearly and directly state the absence of physical harm or damage. It is applicable in both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "is not injured" when describing non-physical harm, such as emotional distress or financial loss. Use more appropriate terms like "unaffected" or "undamaged" in those situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not injured" functions primarily as a predicate adjective, describing the subject's state of being free from physical harm. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Science

8%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not injured" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to indicate the absence of physical harm. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is widely accepted and frequently used across diverse contexts, ranging from news reports to academic papers and informal conversations. While suitable for most situations, it's crucial to avoid using it in contexts involving non-physical harm. Related phrases like "is unharmed" or "sustained no injuries" can offer nuanced alternatives depending on the specific context. With a neutral register and widespread applicability, "is not injured" serves as a valuable tool for clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is unharmed

Focuses on the state of being without harm after a potentially dangerous situation.

is unhurt

A more concise way to say someone did not sustain injuries.

is free from injury

Emphasizes the complete absence of any injury.

sustained no injuries

More formal; emphasizes the absence of injuries received.

didn't get hurt

An informal way to say that someone avoided injury.

escaped unscathed

Highlights that someone avoided any injury or damage in a risky situation.

came through safely

Indicates a successful passage through a potentially harmful event.

is in good condition

Broader; indicates overall well-being, including the absence of injury.

was untouched

Suggests a lack of any physical contact that could cause harm.

remains intact

Often used for objects or structures; signifies no damage.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "is not injured" in a formal context?

In formal situations, you can use alternatives such as "sustained no injuries", "remained unharmed", or "was unscathed" to convey the same meaning with increased formality.

What's a more casual way to say "is not injured"?

For informal communication, consider using phrases like "didn't get hurt", "is okay", or "is fine" to express that someone avoided injury.

When should I use "is not injured" instead of "was not injured"?

"Is not injured" is appropriate when referring to a current state, whereas "was not injured" refers to a past event. For example, "He is not injured after the game" versus "He was not injured during the game".

Are there specific situations where using "is not injured" is more appropriate than others?

Using "is not injured" is especially suitable when providing reassurance after an incident or potential threat, such as stating that a player "is not injured" after a fall during a sports match, or confirming that someone "is not injured" following a car accident.