is not enough for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not enough for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express that something does not meet a required standard or is insufficient for a particular purpose. Example: "The funding provided is not enough for the project to move forward as planned."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But that is not enough for me.

The New York Times

"Anger is not enough for change".

The New York Times

That is not enough for Tory MPs.

The Economist

But indignation is not enough for Europe.

The New York Times

Yet this is not enough for some.

The Guardian - Sport

But this is not enough for some.

The Guardian - Business

"Sorry, that is not enough for me.

The Guardian - Sport

That is not enough for Wells.

The New York Times - Sports

But it is not enough for me.

The Guardian

That is not enough for some.

The New York Times

But this is not enough for ensuring safe roads.

Integrating Disaster Science and Management Global Case Studies in Mitigation and Recovery

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is not enough for", ensure the subject and object are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify what "is not enough" and what it's "not enough for."

Common error

Avoid using "is not enough for" without clearly specifying what the 'it' refers to. This can lead to confusion. Always clarify the subject to maintain clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not enough for" functions as a predicate adjective expressing insufficiency or inadequacy. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

24%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Reference

6%

Encyclopedias

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is not enough for" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that something is insufficient or inadequate for a particular purpose. Ludwig AI demonstrates that it is used across diverse contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings. While the phrase is versatile, it's important to ensure clarity by specifying what 'it' refers to. Alternatives such as "is insufficient for" and "doesn't suffice for" can be used to add nuance. Pay attention to the context to convey meaning in the most effective manner.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is insufficient for

Directly states a lack of the necessary quantity or quality.

falls short for

Emphasizes a failure to reach a required level or expectation.

is not adequate for

Similar to 'insufficient', but may imply a slightly lower standard.

proves inadequate for

Highlights a demonstrated lack of suitability or capability.

doesn't suffice for

Indicates that something is not sufficient to meet a need or requirement.

is not good enough for

More emphatic and subjective, implying a higher standard is desired.

is lacking for

Focuses on the absence of something needed.

is not up to par for

Suggests that something does not meet an expected level of quality or performance.

is unsuited for

Highlights the inappropriateness of something for a particular purpose.

is unfit for

Suggests a strong mismatch or unsuitability for a given purpose or role.

FAQs

How to use "is not enough for" in a sentence?

Use "is not enough for" to indicate that something is insufficient to meet a particular need or requirement. For example, "The budget "is not enough for" the project's completion".

What can I say instead of "is not enough for"?

You can use alternatives like "is insufficient for", "doesn't suffice for", or "falls short for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is not enough for" or "is not enough to"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have different usages. "Is not enough for" is followed by a noun or pronoun (e.g., "is not enough for the task"), while "is not enough to" is followed by a verb (e.g., "is not enough to complete the task").

What's the difference between "is not enough for" and "is inadequate for"?

Both phrases express insufficiency, but "is inadequate for" often implies a more significant or fundamental lack than ""is not enough for"". The choice depends on the degree of insufficiency you want to convey.