is not comprehensive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not comprehensive" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to indicate that something is not complete, thorough, or all-encompassing. For example: "This review of the literature is not comprehensive; the author has simply focused on the most significant sources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The volume is not comprehensive.

The Economist

This list is not comprehensive.

Cornell University

The collection is not comprehensive.

Columbia University

The bag matching system is not comprehensive.

The New York Times

The panorama is not comprehensive: a crucial scene is missing.

The New Yorker

This overview from former owners is not comprehensive.

The New York Times

It is not comprehensive, but it's what we can do.

The New Yorker

Secondly, the (house) foreclosure plan is not comprehensive enough.

Independent

The USPSD covers the entire country, but it is not comprehensive.

The New York Times

This list contains the more important items but is not comprehensive.

Britannica

And that number is not comprehensive because the reporting is voluntary.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is not comprehensive" when accurately describing the limitations of a study, list, or overview, ensuring transparency and managing expectations.

Common error

Avoid stating something is comprehensive without thoroughly checking its scope. Use "is not comprehensive" as a reminder to qualify statements and acknowledge limitations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not comprehensive" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that something lacks completeness or thoroughness. Ludwig examples show it's used to qualify claims, acknowledge limitations, and manage expectations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

31%

News & Media

30%

Science

28%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not comprehensive" is a versatile tool for accurately describing the scope of information or analysis. As demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, it's frequently used across academic, news, and scientific domains to manage expectations and provide transparency. The Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and appropriate for use in written English. When employing this phrase, ensure to provide context regarding what aspects are lacking to maintain clarity. Alternatives such as "is not exhaustive" or ""is not complete"" can be used depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not exhaustive

Replaces "comprehensive" with "exhaustive", implying a lack of thoroughness.

is not all-inclusive

Uses "all-inclusive" to highlight that something doesn't include every possible element.

is not complete

A simpler alternative emphasizing the lack of completeness.

is not thorough

Focuses on the lack of a detailed or careful approach.

is not all-encompassing

Similar to "all-inclusive", stressing that something doesn't cover every aspect.

is not in-depth

Highlights the absence of a deep or detailed examination.

is not extensive

Indicates a limited scope or coverage.

is not holistic

Suggests a lack of consideration for the whole or interconnectedness of parts.

is limited in scope

Explicitly states that the extent or range is restricted.

only scratches the surface

Idiomatic expression implying a very superficial treatment of a subject.

FAQs

How can I use "is not comprehensive" in a sentence?

You can use "is not comprehensive" to indicate that something is incomplete or doesn't cover all aspects of a topic. For example, "This list of resources "is not comprehensive", but it offers a good starting point."

What's the difference between "is not comprehensive" and "is not complete"?

"Is not comprehensive" suggests a lack of thoroughness or detail, while "is not complete" simply means something is unfinished or missing parts. "This study "is not comprehensive"" implies the study lacks depth, whereas "This study "is not complete"" suggests the study is still in progress.

What are some alternatives to saying "is not comprehensive"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "is not exhaustive", "is not all-inclusive", or "is not thorough".

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "is not comprehensive"?

Use "is not comprehensive" when you need to acknowledge the limitations of a list, study, or overview. It's appropriate when you want to be transparent about the scope and avoid misleading your audience. For example: "This overview of the topic "is not comprehensive", as it focuses primarily on recent developments."