is not a result of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not a result of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to clarify that something does not stem from or is not caused by a particular factor or event. Example: "The increase in sales is not a result of the new marketing strategy, but rather due to seasonal demand."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This is not a result of the cuts.

The Guardian - Opinion

That is not a result of some philosophical choice, though.

The New York Times

"It is not a result of judicial activism".

The New York Times

This pattern is not a result of prejudice or inequality.

The Guardian

But that is not a result of political persecution.

The New York Times

It is not a result of tax policies.

The Economist

Irresponsible drinking is not a result of the mixer.

The New York Times - Science

Such a contract is not a result of a negotiation between the parties.

Harvard University

This is not a result of hiring sadistic guards, but a predictable result of operating prisons.

University of California, Berkeley

Ultimately, the rejection of nuclear is not a result of German angst but of economic thinking.

The Guardian - Opinion

The international flavor of the store is not a result of market research.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is not a result of" to clearly and directly negate a cause-and-effect relationship, ensuring clarity in your writing. For instance, "The company's failure is not a result of poor marketing, but rather internal mismanagement."

Common error

Avoid stacking negatives when using "is not a result of". Instead of saying, "It is not that the lack of funding is not a result of poor planning", simplify it to "The lack of funding is a result of poor planning" for clearer communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not a result of" functions as a negating causal connector. It explicitly denies that a particular outcome or condition is caused by a specified factor. Ludwig AI confirms that the expression is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is not a result of" serves to negate a cause-and-effect relationship, clarifying that a specific factor does not produce a particular outcome. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and versatility. It is frequently encountered in news, scientific, and academic contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that the actual causes are clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. While generally neutral, consider using more formal alternatives like "is not attributable to" in professional settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not stem from

Emphasizes the origin or source of something is different.

is not caused by

Directly negates a causal relationship.

is not a consequence of

Similar to "is not a result of" but focuses on the outcome.

does not arise from

Implies a different starting point or beginning.

is not attributable to

Suggests that the cause cannot be assigned to a specific factor.

is unrelated to

Indicates a lack of connection or association.

is independent of

Highlights the lack of influence or dependence.

is not born out of

Emphasizes that the origin or creation is from something else.

is disconnected from

Highlights the lack of any link or association.

bears no relation to

Formally states that there is no connection.

FAQs

How can I use "is not a result of" in a sentence?

Use "is not a result of" to negate a cause-and-effect relationship. For example: "The decline in sales "is not a result of" the new marketing campaign, but rather changing consumer preferences."

What are some alternatives to "is not a result of"?

Alternatives include "is not caused by", "does not stem from", or "is unrelated to", depending on the context.

Is it better to use "is not a result of" or "is due to"?

"Is not a result of" negates a cause, while "is due to" affirms a cause. For example: "The problem is not a result of poor planning; it is due to unforeseen circumstances."

Can "is not a result of" be used in formal writing?

Yes, "is not a result of" is suitable for formal writing. It's a clear and professional way to negate a cause-and-effect relationship. Other alternatives are "is not attributable to" or "bears no relation to".