is marked by

USAGE SUMMARY

"is marked by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe an event or experience that is strongly associated with a certain feeling or trait. For example: His tenure at the company was marked by a strong commitment to innovation.

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Third, social unrest is marked by contagiousness.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The burial service is marked by simplicity.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Verdini's career is marked by firsts.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

This place is marked by absence.

The Guardian

Often regeneration is marked by fun architecture.

The Guardian - Travel

Each character is marked by unfulfilled promise.

The Guardian - Books

TcA is marked by an asterisk.

Nature

It is marked by hands-on, immersive, learning-by-doing.

Columbia University

It is marked by the image of a cracked egg.

The New York Times

Fly-fishing, like life, is marked by milestones.

The New York Times - Sports

But the current frenzied focus is marked by considerable amnesia.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing abstract concepts, pair "is marked by" with concrete examples or evidence to make your writing more impactful.

Common error

Avoid relying too heavily on "is marked by" in descriptive passages. Vary your sentence structure by using more active verbs or rephrasing with stronger adjectives to prevent monotony and enhance reader engagement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is marked by" functions as a linking verb followed by a past participle and a preposition. It connects a subject to a descriptive attribute or characteristic. As Ludwig AI confirms, it correctly and effectively describes something defined by a particular trait.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Academia

20%

Encyclopedias

14%

Less common in

Science

18%

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is marked by" is a versatile tool for highlighting key characteristics. As Ludwig AI affirms, it's grammatically correct and widely used. It serves to connect a subject with a notable attribute, functioning as a linking verb that bridges the subject and its defining trait. The frequency analysis reveals its prevalence across diverse contexts, from news and media to academic discourse and encyclopedic entries. While "is marked by" enjoys broad applicability, it's important to vary sentence structure for richer, more engaging writing. Consider alternatives like "is characterized by" or "is defined by" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is characterized by

Emphasizes the defining characteristics of something, rather than just a notable feature.

is distinguished by

Highlights the unique features that set something apart from others.

is defined by

Focuses on the essential qualities that determine the nature of something.

is known for

Highlights the widely recognized qualities or attributes of something.

is notable for

Suggests that something is remarkable or worthy of attention due to specific features.

features

A concise way of saying something includes particular elements.

exhibits

Suggests a display or demonstration of certain qualities or characteristics.

displays

Similar to "exhibits", but with a slightly more active connotation.

is typified by

Implies that something is a representative example of a larger category.

is symbolized by

Highlights the representative or symbolic nature of a characteristic.

FAQs

How can I use "is marked by" in a sentence?

Use "is marked by" to describe a prominent feature or characteristic of something. For example, "The landscape "is marked by" rolling hills and dense forests".

What are some alternatives to "is marked by"?

You can use alternatives like "is characterized by", "is distinguished by", or "is defined by" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was marked by" instead of "is marked by"?

Yes, "was marked by" is the past tense form and is appropriate when describing something that occurred in the past. For example, "The year 2020 "was marked by" the global pandemic".

What's the difference between "is marked by" and "is known for"?

"Is marked by" emphasizes a specific attribute, while "is known for" highlights a quality that is widely recognized or famous. For example, "The region "is marked by" its unique geology", whereas "The region "is known for" its wine production".