is less compelling

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is less compelling" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to compare the persuasive power or attractiveness of one idea, argument, or piece of content to another, indicating that it is not as strong or convincing. Example: "While the first argument was well-articulated, the second one is less compelling and fails to address key concerns."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Here Breyer is less compelling.

The New Yorker

Here, Mr Roger is less compelling.

The Economist

Even the oil bond is less compelling.

Independent

But the present is less compelling for the Mets.

The New York Times

The retrial's atmosphere is less compelling too, more C-Span than TNT.

The New York Times

"For the rest of Australia, the evidence for a bubble is less compelling.

The Guardian

And the idea of "a feeling of mass injustice" is less compelling than the Tea Party's clear "taxed enough already".

The New York Times

Its British imitator is less compelling for the simple reason that British politics is so much more dominated by party.

The Economist

The band's new album, "Senor Smoke," is less compelling, but features the timely apocalyptic rumination "Jimmy Carter".

The New York Times

But the stylish can't obscure the fact that Ms. Ensler's new material is less compelling than the "Vagina" testimonials.

The New York Times

Though the second part, detailing Timoleon Vieta's odyssey, is less compelling, this is an effortlessly charming and utterly enjoyable novel.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is less compelling", ensure you provide a clear comparison to what is more compelling to give the statement context and impact.

Common error

Avoid using "is less compelling" without clearly establishing what the alternative or comparison point is. Lack of context can make the statement vague and less effective.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is less compelling" functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It is used to describe something as being weaker or less persuasive than something else. Ludwig's AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is less compelling" is a versatile tool for expressing comparative weakness or lack of persuasiveness. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and frequently used across various contexts, particularly in news, media, and scientific writing. To use it effectively, always provide a clear point of comparison. Avoid vagueness by specifying what exactly makes something "less compelling" than another. While alternatives such as "is not as persuasive" or "is weaker" exist, "is less compelling" offers a nuanced way to convey subjective judgments about relative strength or appeal.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not as convincing

Focuses on the lack of persuasiveness.

is not as persuasive

Directly addresses the lack of persuasive power.

is weaker

Highlights the reduced strength or impact.

is less convincing

Emphasizes the reduced ability to persuade.

is not as effective

Focuses on the reduced effectiveness or impact.

is not as impactful

Highlights the reduced level of impact.

lacks force

Indicates a deficiency in power or strength.

is unconvincing

Directly states the lack of convincing quality.

is less impressive

Highlights the reduced level of impressiveness.

fails to resonate

Indicates a lack of emotional or intellectual connection.

FAQs

How can I use "is less compelling" in a sentence?

You can use "is less compelling" to compare the persuasive strength of two arguments or ideas. For example, "While the first proposal was interesting, the second "is less compelling" because it lacks specific details."

What can I say instead of "is less compelling"?

You can use alternatives like "is not as persuasive", "is weaker", or "is less convincing" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is less compelling" or "is not compelling"?

"Is less compelling" implies a comparison, while "is not compelling" is a statement of fact. The choice depends on whether you are contrasting two things or simply stating that something lacks persuasiveness. You can also use "fails to compel" as alternative.

What's the difference between "is less compelling" and "is less convincing"?

While similar, "is less compelling" suggests a weaker overall appeal, encompassing logic, emotion, and other factors. "Is less convincing" focuses more specifically on the lack of logical or factual persuasiveness. You might also say "is not as convincing".