is invariably bad

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is invariably bad" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to describe something that consistently has a negative quality or outcome. For example: "The decision to ignore safety protocols is invariably bad for the company." Alternative expressions include "is always detrimental" and "is consistently harmful."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

My luck is invariably bad here; the motels I pick have youth hockey teams staying there, or sweet-16 slumber parties, and the pool is filled with a happy, noisy bedlam.

The New York Times - Travel

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Witnesses talk of his humour and humanity, but in the passages she quotes from his journals he is invariably bad-tempered or supercilious.

The Guardian - Books

This is confirmed by the testimony of Iamblichus according to which Numenius, Cronius,[1] and Harpocration consider all embodiments to be invariably bad (fr. 48.10 14) and is compatible with Numenius' view that matter is the source of all that is bad (see above, Metaphysics; cf. Dillon 1977, 375-376, Zambon 2002, 213-221).

SEP

Celebrity, that condition of being known by many others for something good or something bad, is invariably fleeting.

The New York Times

In films, fog is invariably a cloak behind which bad things lurk.

The Guardian

Some may argue that Exxon atones for its wrongdoings in other ways, but its actions are invariably in bad faith.

The Guardian

A nation's institutional memory is invariably simplistic and achromatic, with good guys in white hats and bad guys in black.

Huffington Post

Maintenance is invariably slapdash.

The Economist

Eight-tenths is invariably fatal.

The New Yorker

Incomprehension is invariably comical.

The Guardian - Books

The sky is invariably freshly painted.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "is invariably bad", ensure that the context clearly supports the assertion of consistent negativity. Avoid using it in situations where exceptions or variations might exist.

Common error

Avoid using "is invariably bad" if there are exceptions or nuances. Overgeneralizing can weaken your argument and credibility. Be specific and consider alternatives like "is often bad" or "tends to be bad" when appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is invariably bad" functions as a predicate, attributing a consistent negative quality to a subject. It asserts that something has a predictably negative outcome, as seen in Ludwig's examples where certain actions or conditions are described as consistently harmful.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

10%

Reference

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is invariably bad" is a grammatically sound expression used to denote that something consistently yields a negative outcome. Ludwig AI analysis of example sentences from authoritative sources confirms the phrase's validity and communicative purpose. While the usage is relatively rare, it is found in various contexts, including news, science, and business, with a neutral to formal tone. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to ensure the context supports the assertion of consistent negativity, avoiding overgeneralizations that might weaken your argument.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is always negative

Replaces "invariably bad" with "always negative", emphasizing consistent negativity.

is consistently poor

Substitutes "invariably bad" with "consistently poor", focusing on the poor quality.

is predictably awful

Replaces "invariably bad" with "predictably awful", highlighting the expected negative outcome.

is uniformly terrible

Substitutes "invariably bad" with "uniformly terrible", emphasizing the consistent and terrible nature.

is unfailingly substandard

Replaces "invariably bad" with "unfailingly substandard", focusing on consistently low quality.

is regularly deficient

Substitutes "invariably bad" with "regularly deficient", highlighting the consistent lack of something.

is perpetually flawed

Replaces "invariably bad" with "perpetually flawed", emphasizing the continuous imperfection.

is habitually faulty

Substitutes "invariably bad" with "habitually faulty", focusing on the recurring faults.

is ceaselessly imperfect

Replaces "invariably bad" with "ceaselessly imperfect", highlighting the continuous imperfection.

is dependably adverse

Substitutes "invariably bad" with "dependably adverse", focusing on the reliably negative effect.

FAQs

How can I use "is invariably bad" in a sentence?

You can use "is invariably bad" to describe something that consistently has a negative outcome or quality. For example: "Ignoring safety protocols "is invariably bad" for the company."

What are some alternatives to "is invariably bad"?

Some alternatives include "is always negative", "is consistently poor", or "is predictably awful", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "is always bad" or "is invariably bad"?

"Is always bad" and "is invariably bad" have similar meanings, but "is invariably bad" suggests a more predictable or consistent negative outcome. The choice depends on the specific context and desired emphasis.

What does "invariably" mean in the phrase "is invariably bad"?

In the phrase "is invariably bad", "invariably" means consistently or without exception. It emphasizes that something is negatively impactful in every instance.