is harmed

USAGE SUMMARY

"is harmed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a person or object that has suffered damage or injury. For example, "The innocent bystander was harmed as a result of the accident."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Who is harmed?

The Guardian - Sport

Perhaps no one in the room is harmed.

The Economist

If no one is harmed, no pleasure merits guilt.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The population that benefits from or is harmed by the procedure is not clearly defined.

Seminars in Perinatology

Also, the overall learning environment is harmed as subjects not tested are inadequately addressed.

The New York Times

The bottles smash fantastically, artfully designed lights flash, and no one is harmed.

The New York Times - Arts

Mr Fujimori has ruled this out, unless a hostage is harmed.

The Economist

But our nation is harmed when we let our differences separate us and divide us.

The New York Times

"If they engage in conduct that constitutes defamation, the person who is harmed has legal recourse".

The New York Times

"Ultimately their bronchi or alveoli are going to be damaged and the lung function is harmed.

The Guardian

Trump on Tuesday also suggested Kavanaugh is harmed by this situation.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is harmed", ensure the context clearly identifies both the subject being harmed and the cause of the harm. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

While "is harmed" is grammatically correct, overuse of the passive voice can make your writing seem vague or indirect. Consider using active voice where appropriate to strengthen your sentences. For instance, instead of "The environment is harmed by pollution", you could say "Pollution harms the environment".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is harmed" functions as a passive verb construction, indicating that the subject receives the action of being harmed. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, showing that the subject has suffered some form of damage or injury.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

33%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Wiki

9%

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is harmed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. Its primary function is to denote that a subject has experienced damage or injury, with common contexts including news, science, and academic writing. While "is harmed" is widely accepted, it is important to be mindful of potential overuse of passive voice. Related phrases such as "is injured" or "is damaged" may provide suitable alternatives depending on the nuance you wish to convey. This analysis helps clarify its proper usage and potential pitfalls.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is injured

Focuses specifically on physical harm or damage inflicted upon someone or something.

is damaged

Emphasizes the impairment or reduction in value or functionality.

is affected

Indicates that something has been influenced, usually negatively, by an action or event.

is negatively impacted

Highlights the adverse effect of something on the subject.

suffers damage

Implies an experience of loss or detriment.

is compromised

Suggests a weakening or undermining of integrity or effectiveness.

is impaired

Focuses on the diminishment of a function or ability.

is put at risk

Highlights the potential for future harm or danger.

is jeopardized

Indicates that something is endangered or threatened.

is made worse

Emphasizes the deterioration of a condition or situation.

FAQs

How can I use "is harmed" in a sentence?

Use "is harmed" to describe a state where someone or something experiences damage or injury. For example, "The ecosystem "is harmed" by deforestation".

What are some alternatives to "is harmed"?

You can use alternatives like "is injured", "is damaged", or "is affected" depending on the specific type of harm you want to convey.

Which is correct, "is harmed" or "was harmed"?

Both "is harmed" and "was harmed" are grammatically correct, but they indicate different time frames. "Is harmed" describes a present or ongoing state, while "was harmed" describes a past event.

What's the difference between "is harmed" and "causes harm"?

"Is harmed" describes the recipient of the harm, while "causes harm" describes the agent that inflicts the harm. For example, "The patient "is harmed" by the medication" versus "The medication "causes harm" to the patient".