is fundamentally wrong

USAGE SUMMARY

It is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something is deeply or fundamentally wrong. For example: "His argument about the economic situation is fundamentally wrong."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That is fundamentally wrong.

The Guardian

This argument is fundamentally wrong.

The New York Times

That, he added, "is fundamentally wrong".

The Economist

And that, to me, is fundamentally wrong.

The Guardian

"Nothing is fundamentally wrong," Mr. Zuccaro said.

The New York Times

But wherever it happens, it is fundamentally wrong.

Independent

It is fundamentally wrong to divide students by race.

The New York Times

This suggests that something is fundamentally wrong with our assumptions.

The New York Times

That's not to say that what the two Eds are doing is fundamentally wrong.

Independent

Many options exist, but Professor Deaton suggests that the question is fundamentally wrong and self-centered.

The New York Times

Something is fundamentally wrong when the only effective weapon in a union's arsenal is dissolution.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is fundamentally wrong" to express strong disagreement or to point out a critical flaw in an argument, system, or process.

Common error

Avoid using "is fundamentally wrong" in situations that require a more nuanced or diplomatic response. Overusing this phrase can make your communication sound overly aggressive or dismissive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is fundamentally wrong" functions as a strong declarative statement used to express disagreement or to point out a critical flaw in an idea, argument, system, or process. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is commonly used across various reputable sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is fundamentally wrong" serves as a powerful tool to express strong disagreement and to highlight critical flaws. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across various reputable sources. When using this phrase, ensure that it aligns with the context, avoiding overuse in overly emotional or nuanced situations. Alternatives such as "is deeply flawed" or "is entirely incorrect" can provide similar but slightly different nuances. Remember, while impactful, this phrase should be employed judiciously to maintain clarity and avoid sounding overly aggressive.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is entirely incorrect

Highlights complete inaccuracy or lack of correctness.

is wholly inaccurate

Highlights total lack of accuracy or precision.

is seriously mistaken

Focuses on the presence of a significant error or misunderstanding.

is deeply flawed

Emphasizes significant imperfections or defects.

is intrinsically flawed

Emphasizes that the problem is built-in and cannot be easily removed.

is patently false

Highlights the obvious and easily demonstrable falsehood.

is a flawed concept

Focuses on inherent problems within the core idea itself.

is completely misguided

Indicates a misdirection or faulty guidance in thought or action.

is based on a false premise

Highlights that the argument or idea relies on an untrue assumption.

is a gross error

Emphasizes the magnitude and severity of the mistake.

FAQs

How can I use "is fundamentally wrong" in a sentence?

You can use "is fundamentally wrong" to express strong disagreement or to identify a critical flaw in a system, argument, or process. For instance, "The assumption that all students learn at the same pace "is fundamentally wrong"".

What are some alternatives to "is fundamentally wrong"?

Alternatives include phrases like "is deeply flawed", "is entirely incorrect", or "is seriously mistaken", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "is fundamentally wrong" in writing?

It is appropriate to use "is fundamentally wrong" when you want to strongly assert that something is based on flawed principles or contains a critical error. Ensure the context warrants such a strong statement.

What's the difference between "is fundamentally wrong" and "is simply wrong"?

"Is fundamentally wrong" implies a deeper, more foundational problem, suggesting that the core principles are flawed. "Is simply wrong" suggests a more basic, straightforward error without necessarily implying deep-seated issues.