is fully identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is fully identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when stating that something or someone has been completely recognized or specified. Example: "The suspect is fully identified in the police report, which includes a detailed description and photograph."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

There is even a chance that nobody will succeed Mr. Macal, at least in the traditional sense of an autocratic music director who is fully identified with the orchestra yet spends much of his time conducting elsewhere.

The New York Times

The period TAL plane ω years in the past is fully identified, ergo, theoretically the lifespan of each individual in the time of Lexis is knowable.

Genus

Let us now define a general matrix (mathbf {M}) and define the following set of equations: begin{aligned} MA = Aquadquad MB = Bquadquad MSigma M' = Sigma end{aligned} (11)The model is fully identified if the only solution to this system obtained by using the restrictions on A, (mathbf {B}) and (varvec {Psi }) is the identity matrix ((mathbf {M = I})).

Latin American Economic Review

– To note, it is still possible that the stimulus is processed further after the eyes have moved over to the next stimulus so that it is fully identified in the end.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Like many people here, he declined to be fully identified.

The New York Times

None are fully identified, although Billie Holiday, Bessie Smith and Mary Lou Williams seem to be among the subjects.

The New York Times - Arts

Veronica and Paul (neither want to be fully identified) really shouldn't be worried.

The Guardian

The dangerous areas in Vietnam have yet to be fully identified, roped off or cleared.

The New York Times

The materials were provided on condition that the supposed victims not be fully identified, and that the office be concealed.

The New York Times

"It's incredible," said E. Rodriguez, a 48-year-old educator who asked that she not be fully identified.

The New York Times

Both asked not to be fully identified for fear of the authorities.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is fully identified" when you want to emphasize that something or someone has been completely and unambiguously recognized or specified. This phrase is suitable for formal writing where precision is important.

Common error

While "is fully identified" is grammatically correct, overuse of the passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to use an active voice where appropriate for a more direct and engaging style.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is fully identified" functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating that something or someone has been completely and unambiguously recognized or specified. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is fully identified" is a grammatically correct and usable expression that signifies something has been completely and unambiguously recognized or specified. Ludwig's analysis of the phrase from a variety of sources highlights its use in both scientific and news contexts. When writing, it is important to consider the degree of formality required and choose the active voice where appropriate for better clarity. Related phrases, such as "is completely recognized" and "is thoroughly specified", offer alternatives to express similar meanings depending on the nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is completely recognized

This alternative directly replaces "fully identified" with "completely recognized", emphasizing the thoroughness of recognition.

is thoroughly specified

This alternative focuses on the detailed and comprehensive nature of the identification.

is entirely determined

This alternative suggests that all aspects have been ascertained.

is precisely defined

This emphasizes the accuracy and exactness of the identification.

is distinctly characterized

This focuses on the unique attributes that make the identification clear.

is clearly delineated

This alternative stresses the distinct boundaries or features of what is being identified.

is unequivocally established

This conveys certainty and a lack of ambiguity in the identification.

is uniquely pinpointed

This emphasizes the specific and individual nature of the identification.

is definitively ascertained

This implies a conclusive and authoritative determination.

is comprehensively understood

This alternative emphasizes complete understanding.

FAQs

How can I use "is fully identified" in a sentence?

You can use "is fully identified" to indicate that something has been completely recognized or specified. For example, "The suspect "is fully identified" in the police report."

What are some alternatives to "is fully identified"?

Alternatives include "is completely recognized", "is thoroughly specified", or "is entirely determined" depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "is fully identified"?

"Is fully identified" is appropriate in formal contexts where precise and unambiguous identification is necessary, such as in legal, scientific, or technical writing.

Is "is fully identified" the same as "has been fully identified"?

While similar, "is fully identified" describes a current state, whereas "has been fully identified" describes a past action with present relevance. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the process or the result.