is for both

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'is for both' is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to indicate that something applies to two or more people or things. For example: "The new policy is for both employees and customers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The objective is for both streams to feed into recommendations.

The Guardian

This new offering is for both Linux and Windows machines.

The New York Times

How sad that is for both men, for us all.

Independent

Being a feminist is for both women AND men.

Independent

That is how important it is for both our countries to remain within the EU".

The Guardian

What is necessary is for both to cool down and keep in mind the bigger picture".

The Guardian

The next step is for both the Senate and the National Assembly to consider the bill.

The New York Times

Your project is for both television and the third screen, as they call the cellphone?

The New York Times - Magazine

"That trust is for both nuclear weapons and for world-class science.

The New York Times

"Being a feminist is for both women AND men," McGorry stated.

Independent

" Obviously the longer they go, the worse it is for both of you out there".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is for both" when you want to clearly state that something is applicable or intended for two distinct subjects. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures clarity in your communication.

Common error

Avoid using "is for both" when referring to a single entity comprised of two parts. In such cases, a phrase like "applies to all aspects" may be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is for both" functions as a predicate adjective, specifying that a certain quality, purpose, or characteristic applies equally to two distinct entities. This phrase often introduces clarification or emphasis, as seen in Ludwig's examples where policies, products, or initiatives are explicitly designed or intended for two particular groups.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

28%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Unknown

11%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is for both" serves as a clear indicator that something applies equally to two distinct entities, promoting inclusivity and removing ambiguity. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across various contexts. Predominantly found in News & Media and Scientific domains, its neutral register makes it suitable for a wide array of communications. Related alternatives include "applies to both" and "is relevant to both", offering subtle variations in emphasis. When using this phrase, ensure that you're indeed referring to two separate entities to avoid grammatical errors.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

applies to both

This alternative uses a more direct verb to convey the application to multiple subjects.

is applicable to both

This is a more formal and explicit way of stating that something applies to two entities.

is relevant to both

This suggests that something has importance or significance for two entities.

concerns both

This indicates that something is related to or affects two entities.

pertains to both

Similar to "concerns both", this suggests a connection or relevance to two entities.

is intended for both

This emphasizes the purpose or design for two specific entities.

targets both

This implies that two entities are the focus or recipients of something.

caters to both

This suggests that something is designed to meet the needs or preferences of two entities.

suits both

This indicates that something is appropriate or fitting for two entities.

serves both

This implies that something provides a function or benefit to two entities.

FAQs

How can I use "is for both" in a sentence?

You can use "is for both" to indicate that something applies to two distinct entities. For example, "This policy "is for both" employees and customers."

What can I say instead of "is for both"?

You can use alternatives like "applies to both", "is applicable to both", or "is relevant to both" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is for both" or "is for all"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings. "Is for both" refers to two specific entities, while "is for all" refers to a larger, potentially unlimited group.

What's the difference between "is for both" and "is for each"?

"Is for both" indicates that something applies to two entities collectively, while "is for each" implies that something applies to each entity individually.