is foolproof

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is foolproof" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a method, plan, or system that is designed to be reliable and free from failure or error. Example: "The new software update is foolproof, ensuring that even novice users can navigate it without issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This recipe is foolproof.

The New York Times

No system is foolproof.

The New York Times - Tech

This is foolproof.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Yet neither type of contract is foolproof.

The New York Times

The Caveats No biometric technology is foolproof.

The New York Times - Tech

None of these options is foolproof.

The New York Times

But none of the safeguards is foolproof.

The Guardian

But none of the technology is foolproof.

The New York Times - Tech

In other words, no consolidation program is foolproof.

The New York Times

The billion-dollar view is foolproof, needless to say.

The New York Times - Arts

Don't assume an electronic gift certificate is foolproof.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is foolproof" to describe processes or systems that are designed to prevent errors or misuse, particularly in technical or instructional contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "is foolproof" when describing complex systems with inherent risks, as it can create a false sense of security. Qualify the statement to acknowledge potential limitations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is foolproof" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the subject's characteristic of being reliable and immune to error. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage and applicability in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Science

12%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is foolproof" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to convey the reliability and simplicity of a method, plan, or device. Ludwig AI affirms its correct usage across various contexts. While generally neutral in register, it's essential to avoid overstating reliability in complex systems and to consider more formal alternatives when appropriate. The phrase is frequently used in News & Media and Science contexts, making it a versatile and valuable addition to your writing toolkit.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is fail-safe

Emphasizes a built-in mechanism to prevent failure.

is guaranteed

Focuses on the assurance of a positive outcome.

is certain to work

Highlights the sureness of the method's effectiveness.

is sure to succeed

Stresses the inevitability of a favorable result.

is immune to error

Highlights the phrase's resistance to mistakes.

is incapable of failure

Focuses on the impossibility of the method failing.

is reliable

Indicates a consistent and dependable performance.

is dependable

Similar to 'reliable' but emphasizes trustworthiness.

is effective without fail

Adds emphasis to both effectiveness and consistency.

is a no-brainer

Implies extreme simplicity and ease of success.

FAQs

How can I use "is foolproof" in a sentence?

You can use "is foolproof" to describe a plan, method, or device that is designed to be so simple and reliable that it cannot fail or be misused. For example: "This recipe "is foolproof", even for beginner cooks."

What are some alternatives to "is foolproof"?

Alternatives to "is foolproof" include "is fail-safe", "is guaranteed", or "is certain to work". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "is foolproof" in formal writing?

Yes, "is foolproof" is generally acceptable in both formal and informal writing, especially when describing a system or process designed for reliability. However, be mindful of the context and consider whether a more formal alternative like "is fail-safe" might be more suitable.

Can "is foolproof" be used to describe abstract concepts, or only physical objects/processes?

"Is foolproof" can be used to describe both abstract concepts (like a financial strategy) and physical objects/processes (like a cooking recipe). The key is that the concept or object is designed to be reliable and resistant to error.