is evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing proof or support for a claim or argument in various contexts, such as academic writing or legal discussions. Example: "The data collected from the experiment is evidence that supports the hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The difficulty is evidence.

The Economist

There is evidence it may.

The Economist

Here again, there is evidence.

The New York Times

There is evidence.

The Guardian - Opinion

My fantasy is evidence.

The New Yorker

Below is evidence.

The New York Times

There is evidence to support this view.

The New Yorker

Hopkins repugnant tweet is evidence of that.

Independent

But anecdotal evidence is evidence, too.

The New York Times

There is evidence of what is possible.

The New York Times

There is evidence that protectionism is growing.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is evidence", ensure that the evidence is relevant and directly supports the point being made. Avoid using evidence that is only tangentially related.

Common error

Avoid using "is evidence" when the connection between the presented information and the claim is unclear or weak. Ensure that the relationship is explicit to prevent misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is evidence" serves as a declarative statement that explicitly links a subject to supporting information. It functions to introduce or highlight facts, observations, or data that support a claim or assertion. As Ludwig AI suggests, this construction is grammatically correct and frequently found in varied sources.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is evidence" is a grammatically correct construction used to explicitly link information to a claim, thus providing support or proof. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage across diverse contexts, predominantly in News & Media, Science and Formal & Business domains. While not exceedingly frequent, its presence in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Economist reinforces its reliability. For alternatives, phrases like "constitutes proof" or "serves as confirmation" can be used to add nuance. Employ "is evidence" to clarify the connection between data and assertions, ensuring explicit support for the intended argument.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

constitutes proof

Uses a more formal term "constitutes" instead of "is" and "proof" instead of "evidence".

serves as confirmation

Replaces "evidence" with "confirmation", implying a stronger degree of validation.

demonstrates the truth

Emphasizes the act of proving something to be true.

indicates the veracity

Replaces "evidence" with the more formal "veracity", highlighting truthfulness.

suggests the reality

Implies that something is likely real based on the information presented.

validates the claim

Focuses on the act of confirming the validity of an assertion.

corroborates the story

Highlights the strengthening of a narrative or account.

establishes the fact

Emphasizes the establishment of something as a known fact.

substantiates the point

Focuses on providing support for a particular argument or idea.

bears witness to

Replaces "is evidence" with a phrase indicating a direct attestation.

FAQs

How can I use "is evidence" effectively in a sentence?

Use "is evidence" to clearly connect a specific piece of information to a broader claim or conclusion, helping the reader understand why that information matters. For example, "The increase in sales figures "is evidence" of a successful marketing campaign".

What are some alternatives to saying "is evidence"?

Depending on the nuance you want to convey, you can use alternatives like "constitutes proof", "serves as confirmation", or "demonstrates the truth".

Is it always necessary to use "is evidence" when presenting supporting information?

No, you don't always need to use "is evidence". Sometimes the connection between the information and the claim is implicit. However, using "is evidence" can be helpful when you want to make the connection explicit for clarity.

What makes "is evidence" a strong phrase to use in argumentation?

"Is evidence" directly signals that the information provided is intended to support a particular point, making your argument clearer and more persuasive. It helps to explicitly link premises and conclusions.