is earmarked for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is earmarked for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something has been designated or set aside for a specific purpose or recipient. Example: "The funds raised from the charity event are earmarked for local schools in need of resources."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The fuel tax is earmarked for highways.

The Economist

The rest is earmarked for compensating investors.

The Economist

It is earmarked for completion by 2022.

The Guardian

The money is earmarked for environmental and safety-related projects.

The New York Times

Remaining money is earmarked for specific teacher and staff salaries.

The New York Times

Most of that tax money is earmarked for education.

The New York Times

But vast public expenditure is earmarked for post-tsunami reconstruction.

The Economist

One of the funds is earmarked for pensions.

The Economist

The money is earmarked for the public university system.

The New York Times

The remaining $100 million is earmarked for undergraduate education.

The New York Times

This year is earmarked for further retail expansion.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is earmarked for", ensure the context clearly defines both the resource being allocated and the specific purpose or beneficiary. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "is earmarked for" with vague or undefined purposes. Always specify the exact reason or recipient to prevent misinterpretation and maintain transparency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is earmarked for" functions as a passive construction indicating that a resource (usually money, funds, or land) has been officially designated or reserved for a specific purpose. Ludwig's examples show its use in various contexts to highlight planned allocations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is earmarked for" is a commonly used and grammatically sound construction that signifies the designation of resources for a particular purpose. Ludwig's examples reveal its prevalence in news, business, and other formal contexts, demonstrating its function in clarifying planned allocations. The phrase carries a neutral tone suitable for diverse audiences. To ensure clarity, it's best practice to specify the precise purpose or recipient when using this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is designated for

Emphasizes the act of officially assigning something for a specific purpose.

is allocated to

Focuses on the distribution of resources to a particular recipient or purpose.

is set aside for

Highlights the act of reserving something for a specific future use.

is reserved for

Similar to 'set aside', but suggests a more formal or deliberate reservation.

is intended for

Indicates the planned or expected use of something.

is assigned to

Implies a formal assignment of something, often a task or responsibility.

is devoted to

Suggests that something is dedicated or committed to a specific purpose.

is put towards

Emphasizes the application of something to contribute to a specific goal.

is specifically for

Highlights that something is exclusively for a particular purpose or recipient.

is tagged for

Implies that something has a label associating it with a particular purpose or recipient

FAQs

How do I use "is earmarked for" in a sentence?

Use "is earmarked for" to indicate that something, typically money or resources, has been designated for a specific purpose. For example, "The funds raised are "is earmarked for" the new school project".

What are some alternatives to "is earmarked for"?

You can use alternatives such as "is designated for", "is allocated to", or "is set aside for" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "funds are earmarked to" instead of "funds are earmarked for"?

While some might use "earmarked to", "funds are earmarked for" is the more common and grammatically preferred construction. It clearly indicates the destination or purpose of the funds.

What's the difference between "is earmarked for" and "is intended for"?

"Is earmarked for" suggests a more formal and definite allocation, often involving a specific budget or plan. "Is intended for" simply implies a planned use, without necessarily indicating a formal commitment of resources.